jamesb

June 19, 2007

Hmm, I believe that was my Canon EOS-30, 35mm prime lens. Big, black nasty looking camera, but reasonably quiet ;-)

May 29, 2007

He didn't notice, I shot without looking.

April 30, 2007

Yep, wonderful. Now I have to go to Syria :-). Waterwheels right? Thanks.

April 30, 2007

Interesting, but perhaps its lacking some drama or lines. I'm not sure how to improve it, sorry about that. Thanks.

March 29, 2007

Interesting, but it would work better if the sculpture was 'looking' at someone rather than past them. Thanks.

March 29, 2007

Absolute minimal information, I can barely even read the exit sign. Excellent, love it. Thanks.

March 28, 2007

Sit by the lake...

March 24, 2007

Yeah, my blurries are mostly accidents, yours are very deliberate. Nice work.

March 24, 2007

...

March 23, 2007

Nice as a family photo, but otherwise you might like to watch the background. Its a bit busy, perhaps something simpler. Also I think that it is a little backlit perhaps, it might look better at a different angle.

March 23, 2007

Nice use of square frame.

March 23, 2007

I presume a self-portrait. Quite effective. Thanks.

March 21, 2007

Shot in Melbourne, Australia some years ago.

March 20, 2007

I would have been tempted to get closer to the line between shadow and light and try to get someone's face only in the light. But that is easier said than done.

March 20, 2007

I guess I see it differently than Arjen, I'm wanting the mirror image of Dad's shadow on Mum's head. Cool shot nonetheless.

March 20, 2007

Fantastic. It would be funnier if the foot touched her head, but maybe it would look less like she was going to be kicked ;-) Thanks, James

March 20, 2007

Very interesting. I agree about the distracting elements but in these situation what can you do about it? Not much.

March 18, 2007

Oh yeah. This works well. Strangely I saw the painting fist (face and 'pow') and then noticed the painter. Painters face lines up nicely with a dark patch in the painting for a little delineation. Thanks.

March 18, 2007

I disagree about seeing more of the face. This is an exercise in removing unnescessary information. Nice work.

March 18, 2007

Yeah, the juxtaposition works well. The foreground makes you look up as well.

Thanks.

October 31, 2006

Thanks, actually yeah I've done nothing to it. I havn't experimented much with dodging & burning, the few times I've tried it (post scanning) I havn't been very satisfied with the results. Certainly the girl's top needs some detail, assuming its on the negative :-)

April 11, 2002

Ouch! we've lost our heads.

April 11, 2002

Very nice idea, would be very interested in further technical details. The horizontal fellow seems relatively motionless compared to the vertical fellow. Was some form of blur added to his legs? Or is that just the coke bottle you shot through :-)

April 11, 2002

Maybe single out the tree and it's shadow. I don't understand why the shadow is a problem, it creates a nice shape solidiying the original shape of the tree. Perhaps swing around and include the building behind the base of the tree, I'm not sure. The clouds on the left and open space to the left don't add anything for me. Thanks

April 11, 2002

Maybe crop the uppermost fellow off?

Sign In

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

Downloads

Gallery

Store

Image Comments posted by jamesb