Jump to content

digitaldog

PhotoNet Pro
  • Posts

    8,188
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by digitaldog

  1. Again, just check the Adobe user-to-user forums for those speaking of GPU issues, Mac vs. Windows. Quote rare for Mac users with modern GPUs. Not so with Win users. Big difference: One company controls all aspects of GPU for those Adobe apps. The other isn't the case. As for LR being crash-prone, I can't recall it ever happening to this Mac user. Based on your hardware, OS, YMMV. 

  2. First, the preview architecture in Develop is unique to all other modules and the most accurate preview of the data. You should always view previews there and elsewhere at 1:1 or greater and when comparing, use the same zoom for each. So compare at 100% zoom in PS and 1:1 in Develop.
    It is normal to see slight differences at 1:1 but if really excessive, you might have a corrupted display profile. Recalibrate the display or whatever you usually do to create a display profile. When given the option to build this profile, pick Version 2 (not V4) and Matrix not LUT. As to viewing Develop module and Library and outside of LR, it helps to soft proof in Develop using the same profile used in Library (Adobe RGB (1998).
     

    • Yes! 1
  3. The learning curve with a drum scanner is the mounting with gel (or oil) which is messy but often necessary. Plus the software; some, like those driven by LinoColor or ScanView are great, didn’t like Howtek. Then there is Imacon which is kind of, sort of a drum (but not PMT) and really a great compromise: fast, easy to use, pretty good software. Great for color neg scans. 

  4. Got an Epson V750, decent but not in the close to the league with a deadicated film scanner like the Coolscan and even that isn’t in the legaue with a Leaf or Imacon. Amazing too, in early 1990, the first Nikon I had cost $10K in 1990 dollars. 

    $1339 isn’t a bad price for the product either. An Epson V850 is a mere $100 less on B&H. 

  5. Leaf was also avaiable as SCIS (a bit newer) and much easier to hook up to older Macs which is how I ran mine in the day. 

    But if I had to buy a such a high quality scanner today, I’d look for an Imacon which is lightening fast in comparision or better, a ScanMate Drum scanner which quality wise is even better. 

  6. The Photoshop screen capture* doesn’t look right to me but see comments below. The middle one doesn’t make sense to me, we want apples to apple comparisons in all cases. 

    The two applications when setup correctly and bug free (GPU/profile handling etc) should preview identically. 

    * The screen captures are ending up in sRGB to upload so I can't comment on the quality of the colors seen, only how the differ, side by side from each other and indeed, for some reason, the printer profile softproof looks really bad. 

    Do you see oddities like this to printer profiles if you pick a totally different profile, even for a different printer?

×
×
  • Create New...