Jump to content
© ©Copyright tony Hadley Photography 2013

Waterton Park - Alberta


thadley

Artist: J.A. (Tony) Hadley;
Exposure Date: 2009:09:30 17:54:57;
Copyright: No use permitted unless explicitly provided by J.A. (Tony) Hadley;
Make: NIKON CORPORATION;
Model: NIKON D300;
Exposure Time: 1/60.0 seconds s;
FNumber: f/22.0;
ISOSpeedRatings: ISO 200;
ExposureProgram: Other;
ExposureBiasValue: +715827881 1/3
MeteringMode: Other;
Flash: Flash did not fire;
FocalLength: 13.0 mm mm;
FocalLengthIn35mmFilm: 19 mm;
Software: Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows;

Copyright

© ©Copyright tony Hadley Photography 2013

From the category:

Landscape

· 290,486 images
  • 290,486 images
  • 1,000,012 image comments


Recommended Comments

Superb,but why so small wish to delight the eyes with a bigger image,is breathtaking,to be there and admire what can else want to do,compliments.

Link to comment

As you know this is one of my favorite places and you've flung a severe craving on me to go back with this superb landscape... Love it... Mike

Link to comment

Superbly balanced landscape, sharp well defined foreground and majestic backdrop!  |It does look like a stunning location! 

Compliments! 

 

Alf 

Link to comment

Patsy, AJ, Radu, Michael, Hans, Panayotis, Erik, Deanna and Alf. Many thanks for your visit and kind words. Usually when I visit a location (Oct 2009) like this I 'work it' from pre-dawn to sunrise and you can end up with a fairly high number of images. I did not select  this image before and it is with some regret that I did not share it until today.

 

PS Montana border crossing (USA) is about  20  minute drive from here and then on to the Glacier National Park. http://www.pc.gc.ca/pn-np/ab/waterton/index.aspx

All the best,

 

Link to comment

I find my eye goes first to the piece of timber then over to the dramatic backdrop. Really like

the colour of the lake (acquamarine ?).  Great stuff !

Kind regards

Jim

Link to comment

I like the warmth of this, Tony.  I'm curious why you chose f/22.  The branch and grasses seem far enough away that f/16 or even f/11 could have been used to retain depth of field while increasing sharpness (by reducing diffraction).   Regards, Jeff

Link to comment

Slavo - glad you liked the image.

 

Jeff - this is an image I took back in 2009 and had not shared it before. I have made a few steps in photo knowledge since then and I would never intentionally go with f22 unless I had forgotten my ND filter and I wanted a slow speed. With my sigma 10-20mm I shoot these kind of shots now with f8 through f13. I know that F8 is supposed to be very good but to my untrained and unscientific eye, I prefer the shots with f13.

 

All the very best,

 

 

 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...