brad_mirakian Posted June 10, 2003 Share Posted June 10, 2003 I need some advise on the development of some photographs involved in a lawsuit. The state provided me with some pictures from the crime scene involving a car wreck. At the first trial, I noted some marks on the windshield of the car that could have been helpful to the case. I later asked the state for extra copies of the photos. The new copies I received are much brighter and washed out, making it difficult to see the marks on the windshield. I am suspicious that the state, knowing my interest in those marks, purposefully tampered with the development process so as to make it harder to see them. I know that the state had a local one-hour photo shop develop them. My question is, if this was the result of a poorly calibrated machine, what could the developer have done to achieve the above effect? Essentially, I�m going to investigate this, and I�d like to know what sort of things to look for when talking to the developer. Thanks a bunch! - Brad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_menegatos Posted June 10, 2003 Share Posted June 10, 2003 they could have printed them darker. Try and go to the lab with when they get enlargements done and bring an attorney and your own photo processor to inspect the negatives and the prints. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James G. Dainis Posted June 10, 2003 Share Posted June 10, 2003 Ask to see the negatives and check them with a loupe or magnifying glass. If the marks are on the negative they should be on a "properly" made print. No deceit may have been intended. The same negative may give different results on different machines or at different times due to the amount of exposure that the machine analyzer decides is needed to get a well exposed print. If it "thinks" the print will be too dark, it will lighten it up; if it "thinks" it will be too light, it will darken it down. James G. Dainis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephen hazelton Posted June 11, 2003 Share Posted June 11, 2003 Sounds like just bad processing, rather than intentional deceit. (Printing the pictures lighter may actually show MORE detail in other parts of the picture). If you can work directly with the one hour lab, ask them to print the picture, then print it a bit darker, then a bit darker- and one of the shots should match what you want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now