Jump to content

Monday in Nature, 8 January 2024


Mary Doo

Recommended Posts

Basic Guidelines: In the strictest sense, nature photography should not include "hand of man elements". Please refrain from images with buildings or human made structures like roads, fences, walls. Pets are not permitted. Captive subjects in zoos, arboretums, or aquariums are permitted, but must be declared, and must focus on the subject, not the captivity. Images with obvious human made elements will likely be deleted from the thread, with an explanation to the photographer. Guidelines are based on PSA rules governing Nature photography which also cover the Nature Forum. Keep your image at/under 1000 pixels on the long axis for in-line viewing. Note that this includes photos hosted off-site at Flicker, Photobucket, your own site, etc.

Each member please post no more than just one image to this weekly thread per week. If the information is available, many members appreciate information on your approach to making the image and the names, both common and scientific, of the subject(s). However, while encouraged, these are not required as a component of your contributions.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This image was captured - oh eons ago - in Alaska's Katmai NP with my Nikon 200-400 on a D70.  I remember seeing the young bear cub grappling with a struggling salmon; grasping and losing it repeatedly.  Obviously he was learning to fish.  Every time he had the fish in his grip, he paused to look around, perhaps to see if anyone saw his achievement 😉 or more likely he was worried about potential thieves. Finally, he managed to hold on to the fish securely and went to see his mother. His sibling immediately appeared from nowhere, no doubt he wanted to share the spoil.  Now this cub was still wrestling with the challenge of eating the slippery scaley thing that was attempting to escape, with his sibling looking on with aggressive impatience. So in this image Mama Bear is pushing the sibling away, as if to say "Give your brother space, and find your own salmon."  😉3BearsinAlaska.jpg.7eb23ded162f1a2c5d65d466ea0582ff.jpg

  • Like 6
  • Excellent! 2
  • Very Nice 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Mary Doo said:

Brian, what are those "dots" around the egret?

Mary, The dots were created by the sun reflecting off of water.  The egret was in a wet marsh-type area and the vegetation was covered in water which created the dots.  I was shooting towards the south/southwest somewhat towards the sun which was getting low in the sky..  I was slightly above the egret so the background was the vegetation in the lake.  I under exposed the background a little to make it less distracting, but perhaps I didn't darken it enough.

1 hour ago, ShunCheung said:

Brian and I had another discussion last week: https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/551018-nature-unlimited-5-january-2024/#comment-5812574

Not sure Brian also used the Nikkor 400mm/f4.5 S here. He is getting some unusual bokeh. I have that lens also, and it is a conventional tele, not a PF lens.

Shun, my lens was the Nikkor Z 400mm f/4.5 VR S but I had the Z TC-1.4x attached.  The settings were 1/3200 second @ f/6.3. ISO 1000/

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • ShunCheung changed the title to Monday in Nature, 8 January 2024
On 1/8/2024 at 10:13 PM, brian_niemi1 said:

Mary, The dots were created by the sun reflecting off of water.  The egret was in a wet marsh-type area and the vegetation was covered in water which created the dots.  I was shooting towards the south/southwest somewhat towards the sun which was getting low in the sky..  I was slightly above the egret so the background was the vegetation in the lake.  I under exposed the background a little to make it less distracting, but perhaps I didn't darken it enough.

 

On 1/8/2024 at 8:54 PM, ShunCheung said:

He is getting some unusual bokeh. I have that lens also, and it is a conventional tele, not a PF lens.

The bokeh is unusual because they are not just circles.  They seem to reflect something from the background.  Interesting.  Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last week, I thought perhaps Brian was using a mirror (catadioptric) lens or a PF lens, but it turns out to be the Nikkor 400mm/f4.5 S in the Z mount. That lens has conventional elements, and at least I haven't noticed such bokeh on mine. Perhaps I haven't used mind in backlit situations that often.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...