Jump to content

Politics: there's one thing we can agree upon


Recommended Posts

<p>Visually speaking, of course</p>

<p>Bernie: grumpy<br>

Clinton: vile<br>

Christie: x-large<br>

Fiorina: ghastly<br>

Trump: look at my hair!<br>

Rubio: nice looking 'bot<br>

Cruz: Cuban Canadian, really?<br>

Carson: quiet <br>

Kasich: bland<br>

Perhaps, a *bigger* camera will make them look different? Nah...</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I happened to cover several of the early 2016 presidential debates for TV, and also managed to shoot a few stills (of course, when shooting the more prominent candidates, I had to do my real job and couldn't take any photos). My lovely reporter is in the fourth frame:</p>

<p><img src="http://studio460.com/images/debate-1.jpg" alt="" /></p>

<p><img src="http://studio460.com/images/debate-8.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="466" /></p>

<p><img src="http://studio460.com/images/debate-3.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="467" /></p>

<p><img src="http://studio460.com/images/debate-10.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="466" /></p>

<p><img src="http://studio460.com/images/debate-7.jpg" alt="" /><br /> <br /> A photo of me from one of the early debates was posted in the <em>New York Times</em> online edition, which I only just found: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/live/second-republican-debate-cnn-election-2016/all-wound-up-and-ready-to-spin">[scroll down to fifth photo]</a>. (I'm on the left with my camera pointed up.) I knew I was in another <em>NYT</em> shot which was much wider, but I hadn't seen this one. I think I covered five debates in total (both RNC and DNC). It was a fun and interesting series of assignments.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...