Rick Bortnick Posted August 2, 2015 Share Posted August 2, 2015 <p>I was going to go for a real minimalistic image this week - wasn't sure how that would go over. I liked the idea of limiting the image elements, lets the imagination run amok. But that's me. So a compromise image.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Bortnick Posted August 2, 2015 Author Share Posted August 2, 2015 <p>Larger version</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaellinder Posted August 2, 2015 Share Posted August 2, 2015 <p>Another excellent choice, Rick.</p> <p>In PSE11, I cropped out the small tree and quite a bit of sky. I then adjusted the shadows and highlights with levels. Using Color EFEX, pro contrast helped to correct color cast and put the finishing touch on tonal levels. Finally, I used Viveza to accent the large tree.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LineMartel Posted August 2, 2015 Share Posted August 2, 2015 <p>I recomposed by cropping the image, cutting and placing the left tree, cloned out right tree. Blended the composition with the mixer brush and layers. Cloned branches to the left of the tree. Adjusted color and lighting in Topaz Adjust. Made final color and lighting adjustments in Color Efex. Added birds with PS brush. Sharpened.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenn McCreery Posted August 2, 2015 Share Posted August 2, 2015 <p>I like the photo with it's muted pastel colors, but wanted to add something to the mostly blank middle section. So, I located an old photo of mine of cows in fog and overlayed a few cows using a "soft light" adjustment layer in Photoshop CS5 with 40% opacity and 44% fill. Then I added a graduated neutral density filter to the top portion and adjusted hue/saturation slightly, cropped the image to reduce the amount of sky, and called it good. Line's addition of birds to the sky was a good choice.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dieter Schaefer Posted August 2, 2015 Share Posted August 2, 2015 <p>Can't help but wonder about what I assume are two deliberate choices made by the photographer -severe underexposure and the choice to not include either tree fully in the frame. The first is correctable, the second IMHO fatal.<br /> In any case, I basically just corrected exposures and adjusted curves in ACR - and a bit of polishing thereafter in Perfect Effects (darkened midtones, and warmed up the sky). Cropped to 16:9 to eliminate some sky. Forgot to apply the CCW rotation to straighten out the windmill.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerald Cafferty Posted August 2, 2015 Share Posted August 2, 2015 <p>Thanks for the Challenge.<br> Mainly just exposer and colour balance adjustment in bands across the scene. Adjusted the verticals and removed one tree (should have taken more time and care with this).<br> Adjustments in Lightroom 5.7 and Elements 10 used.</p> <div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Bortnick Posted August 2, 2015 Author Share Posted August 2, 2015 <p>Dieter<br> Sorry you feel that way. IMHO - I think you missed the idea of this forum, perhaps one of these would be better suited for your wants:<br> <a href="/photo-critique-forum/">http://www.photo.net/photo-critique-forum/</a><br> <a href="/photo-of-the-week-discussion-forum/">http://www.photo.net/photo-of-the-week-discussion-forum/</a><br> <a href="/philosophy-of-photography-forum/">http://www.photo.net/philosophy-of-photography-forum/</a><br> On the other hand, you could always start the next Challenge. We are always looking for volunteers to post.<br> Rick</p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DawsonPointers Posted August 2, 2015 Share Posted August 2, 2015 <p>Oops. Guess the backspace key wasn't the best choice to try to edit the text before posting to the forum. Please see below.</p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DawsonPointers Posted August 2, 2015 Share Posted August 2, 2015 <p>Hi Rick:<br /> First time participating in this forum so let me know if i'm off base with this post. I used Lightroom and Ps for editing.<br /> I liked the visual layering provided by the inclusion of the trees. I also loved the tonality of the image. It looks quite different on my portable vs my desktop; so, I'm kinda stabbing in the dark making adjustments to the tonality.<br /> I cropped to 1:1 using content aware scale to keep both trees in. I thought I'd like the light to come primarily from the right so I converted to 8bit and used lighting effects in the filters gallery to put the main light to come from the right at a low angle. I also added a bit of orange/yellow to that lighting effect. I used High Pass sharpening to try to make the tree on the left look better defined. I'm iffy as to whether that was a good idea.<br /> Next was the obligatory border (for me) and back to Lightroom for export.<br /> Lots of fun.<br /> Regards</p> <p> </p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_earussi1 Posted August 2, 2015 Share Posted August 2, 2015 <p>A fun image, thanks for posting:</p> <p><img src="http://m9.i.pbase.com/g9/17/763317/2/160915419.JssMy3dT.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="600" /></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunil_malkani Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 <p>My take: Basic processing in ACR. In CS6 used Nik collections color efx pro plug in with the following filters in order: graduated ND, graduated fog, tonal contrast. Cropped in CS6.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunil_malkani Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 <p>For some reason the photo did not upload.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunil_malkani Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 <p>Retry again</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaellinder Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 <p>Mike, what were your pp steps?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerald Cafferty Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 <p>Hi Rick, I have figured out how to contribute to WPPC, but I wouldn't have a clue as to how to start a new thread. If you could give advice for "Dummies" I might at some point be able to give you an image to play with. Assuming I'm not the only technophobe out here it could result in more volunteers. Cheers Gerald. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JRCrowe Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 <p>Its kind of a cliche but what the heck.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Bortnick Posted August 3, 2015 Author Share Posted August 3, 2015 <p>Gerald & anyone else who is interested. This is a three step process.<br> <strong>1 - Application process</strong><br> I ask for a volunteer to start the next challenge (usually on Thursday). The first one to respond wins. No one steps up, its my choice for the next one.</p> <p><strong>2 - Image process</strong><br> If you win you will need to have two jpeg images. Images are to be raw (unaltered that is), one sized for the forum display (700 pixels long axis) the other the original size.</p> <p><strong>3 - Posting process</strong><br> The winner starts the next challenge typically on Sunday morning, (though sometimes late Saturday night works better for the poster).</p> <p> On the Digital forum main page, look at the upper right. Click on the <strong>Post Question</strong> link. Make sure in the subject you let us know its the challenge. When you hit post button you will be asked to attach an image, use the small (700 pixel ) jpeg.</p> <p> Respond to your new thread and post the large (original sized) jpeg. If you haven't done this before, don't worry about the (sometimes) long time it takes to upload. Also, it will not be displayed, just the link.</p> <p><strong>4 - optional</strong><br> Sit back & enjoy the show.</p> <p>Hope that helps & feel free to PM me if you want more info.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_earussi1 Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 <p>Michael, sorry I really didn't keep detailed notes on what I did (too many steps anyway to keep track of), just put it in ACR and had fun.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Bortnick Posted August 4, 2015 Author Share Posted August 4, 2015 <p>What I had done was:<br> 1: increased vibrancy & saturation<br> 2. adjusted curve a tad<br> 3. cropped</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Bortnick Posted August 6, 2015 Author Share Posted August 6, 2015 <p>Now that is done...Any one up for next time?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerald Cafferty Posted August 7, 2015 Share Posted August 7, 2015 <p>OK Rick, I will find one for the next challenge.<br> Gerald.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now