JRCrowe

In Lightroom,Cropped +Clarity, Saturation, Vibrance, dehaze, + red, orange channels. In photoshop made a selection of seagull layer via copy, duplicated layer, flipped new layer horizontally, used clone tool to distribute birds, flattened.

Fred the point of this thread is you get to do your own artistic rendering of the photo.

Glenn's treatment is close to what the camera actually saw, but in person it was very red. As you know the camera sees colors very differently than the human eye. That loss of separation between water and mountain was due to lifting the shadows so much. My posted treatment is only one of five different ones I have done of this photo. Its a fun one to experiment with. Here is a link to the same sunset by a different photographer.

Here is one of my final versions. The big problem I had was that the camera (5D MKII) saw more orange when to the eye everything was red. I used the color adjustments in Lightroom and in the orange channel moved the hue slider to the left and reduces saturation, luminance. White balance set to 4380. shadows +100 whites +40. I had the RAW file to work with though and that makes a difference. The vignette was lens related a Sigma 24-70 2.8 older version.

I will post something for this weeks challenge if nobody minds. This was Santa Monica beach July 18th 2012 with the remnants of a hurricane flowing over Southern California. This is from the unprocessed raw file which isn't even close to what it felt like to be there. Everyone along the beach stopped what they were doing because we all knew we would never see anything like this again in our lives. It has been frustrating to try and get the actual feeling in the photo that was there that day. It was like being wrapped in a warm red blanket. I will post my version in a day or two. You will think I overdid the processing and that would not be true.

In Lightroom +clarity,vibrance, saturation, dehaze, warmed white balance and magenta tint raised shadows lowered highlights +blue saturation -luminance. In photoshop unsharp mask added another dog.

Ground Squirrel.

This is the additional weekly image thread for the Nature Forum. While images posted to this thread should still be nature in theme, it may contain a small amount of human-made objects and therefore less restricted than the Monday in Nature threads. Please see this discussion for more details: Alternative weekly thread in Nature forum Each participant please post no more than just one image per weekly thread.

1937 Talbot Lago

Mallow

In Photoshop posterized, in filters chose stylize then extrude, then posterized one more time.

This is the additional weekly image thread for the Nature Forum. While images posted to this thread should still be nature in theme, it may contain a small amount of human-made objects and therefore less restricted than the Monday in Nature threads. Please see this discussion for more details: Alternative weekly thread in Nature forum Each participant please post no more than just one image per weekly thread. I recently drove from Northern California to Southern California on Interstate 5 and it was a day of clouds of many different types.

Basic Guidelines: In the strictest sense, nature photography should not include "hand of man elements". Please refrain from images with buildings or human made structures like roads, fences, walls. Pets are not permitted. Captive subjects in zoos, arboretums, or aquariums are permitted, but must be declared, and must focus on the subject, not the captivity. Images with obvious human made elements will likely be deleted from the thread, with an explanation to the photographer. Guidelines are based on PSA rules governing Nature photography which also cover the Nature Forum. Keep your image at/under 1000 pixels on the long axis for in-line viewing. Note that this includes photos hosted off-site at Flicker, Photobucket, your own site, etc. Each member post one image to this weekly forum Summit Meadow Yosemite National Park

Sorry I couldn't get the thread started this week, yard work took precedence. One benefit was finding this on a dead branch. Haven't had time to identify it yet.

Basic Guidelines: In the strictest sense, nature photography should not include "hand of man elements". Please refrain from images with buildings or human made structures like roads, fences, walls. Pets are not permitted. Captive subjects in zoos, arboretums, or aquariums are permitted, but must be declared, and must focus on the subject, not the captivity. Images with obvious human made elements will likely be deleted from the thread, with an explanation to the photographer. Guidelines are based on PSA rules governing Nature photography which also cover the Nature Forum. Keep your image at/under 1000 pixels on the long axis for in-line viewing. Note that this includes photos hosted off-site at Flicker, Photobucket, your own site, etc. Each member please post no more than just one image to this weekly thread per week. I have been trying unsuccessfully to identify this plant. It grows in the rows of almond orchards here in California and is treated like a weed. It seems to be important to the local honeybees though as it flowers early and continuously for many months. The blossoms are about 10mm across. Having no luck with online resources.