Jump to content

Old School Darkroom for Smartphones


Recommended Posts

<p>I have seen someone doing the very same thing with an ordinary enlanger.<br>

It seems almost easier and faster than downloading and printing via digital equipment. I have to try it one day, but I missed how to get a reversed image...</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I would pay $200 or whatever they're asking. And it's scary to think they've separated $38,000 from innocent people, but maybe I'm just jealous I didn't think of it first. :)<br /><br />But this does almost seem like a fun weekend project. The image on my iPhone 6 would easily fit into the opening on a 6x9 negative carrier, and with my Omega D2 I could open the head wide enough for the phone to simply lay on top of the carrier. I can reverse the image to negative. Control exposure on and off simply by holding a piece of cardboard over the enlarger lens or the paper. It's just a question of how long the epxosure time would be and how badly the pixels would show up once the image is enlarged.<br /><br />Or I could just click print on the phone. :)</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote>

<p>"Or I could just click print on the phone. :)"</p>

</blockquote>

<p>Yeah, mpix offers prints on b&w RC paper from my digital files. It satisfies my cravings for the clink of real silver in my paper.</p>

<p>If I had the space to set up an enlarger I'd just print my own negatives. My vertical column Durst enlargers don't take up any more room than that. And I keep hoping to clear out a closet for a darkroom printing space again. Just using film doesn't give me a thrill, but I do miss being able to pop into the darkroom to make a print whenever the muse strikes. Now it's a major production to set up.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Umm, so you get the 16 MP photo downsized to the resolution of the screen which is at best 2 MP, probably more like 1.5 MP because of aspect ratio differences, the enlarging lens presumably anti-aliases (i.e., blurs) even the few leftover pixels and you can print "exhibition-ready" prints up to 20x20 cm (8x8 inch)? Those prints must be very "artistic" (blurry). I can see the coolness of it but can't imagine many people using for more then a few prints, especially when the smell of the stop bath and the fixer starts stinking up their place.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>After reading the OP, I thought it could be interesting. I went down to my darkroom and put my iPhone 6 in my enlarger on top of the 4x5 negative carrier. The phone casts quite a bright image on the paper below. I did not go ahead and print. Perhaps next time I am printing I may play around with it some. </p>

<p>It could be fun to play with. I think I have an app that allows me to invert an image on the phone to a negative. </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Good point Peter! - At least the pixel math part. - I honestly don't know if I ever minded stop bath & fixer smells.<br>

So how to get more pixels on paper? - Cobble 4 or 5K screens on process cameras? Did anybody bother to write software to use them for splitgrade exposures? What kind of device is used to do regular (comercial) silverprinting from files?<br>

I don't own a smart phone so I see little value in the ENFOJER project for myself. But now I am wondering if cobbling some insane pixel density tablet on my Chromega might make sense? - It could be at least less expensive than going dye sub for small prints.</p>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...