wogears Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 <p>I think Fujifilm is really 'onto' something with the Instax cameras, and I hope they continue to develop (pun intended) more products. Judging from <a href="http://www.fujirumors.com/instax-rules-them-all-massive-sales-of-fujis-instax-film-instax-cameras-sell-better-than-fujifilm-x-t1/?fb_action_ids=335449289996563&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_ref=addtoany&fb_source=other_multiline&action_object_map=[718595064885128]&action_type_map=[%22og.likes%22]&action_ref_map=[%22addtoany%22]">this article</a> (on a rumor site, but <em>not</em> reporting a rumor), they are doing pretty well.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lex_jenkins Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 As rumors sites go, that one seems to be more vapor than most. However, since launching the X100, Fuji is/are (?) enjoying the benefits of their work at effectively leveraging social media and influential photographers to help promote some clever niche products. It's also a matter of good timing. Instax seems to be trending now. Some photographers I follow on social media are big fans of instant cameras. It's been awhile since any of them posted about Impossible Project film, but they do seem to like the Instax. Those mentions are often tied to ads on social media, and click-throughs tend to perpetuate the brand recognition. I'd like to try Instax, but it seems like an expensive experiment. Recently I've been going through boxes of old family photos. The quality of our snapshots really deteriorated during our Polaroid phase. The Polacolor prints have suffered fading and color shifts, although those are sometimes interesting for transfers. The later SX type Polaroid prints are more stable, but most were badly underexposed compared with earlier Polaroids. I think I'll stick with CVS dye sub prints for when I need quick results. Only 30¢ apiece for 4x6, good quality from their Kodak printers, and it's self serve, no waiting for a lab tech. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c_watson1 Posted January 2, 2015 Share Posted January 2, 2015 <p><em>However, since launching the X100, Fuji is/are (?) enjoying the benefits of their work at effectively leveraging social media and influential photographers to help promote some clever niche products. It's also a matter of good timing.</em><br> <em> </em><br> <em><br /></em>Never mind that Fuji products seem most popular among consumers who are the least likely to be herd animals led around by whatever is "trending."</p> <p>Compared to the exaggerated appeal of Lomography and its bid to "brand" film photography, Fuji Instax products seem to be widely available and do sell. The cameras are cheap and the film pacs easy to load. The credit card-size photos are novelties and popular among those who never saw or shot instant film. Unlike Impossible, Instax film is consistent and predictable.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now