"Public Domain" defense in topless publication?

[jason]

<p>Yelp all She wants! France has Draconian Laws about "Invasion of Privacy" even on the street! A blatant invasion of a couple's privacy, even if a public figure.<br>

I love doing street photography. This set of photos are stupid and only for selling these crummy papers.. Newspapers are slowly dieing everywhere. They do not report the truth as regards Financial catastrophes, being owned by the people who are robbing the world blind.. <br>

Sure here and there, a slight piece of investigative journalism. The Watergate expose! Yes! Yes, but, Nixon was ENDING a very lucrative war for industrialists.. A famous writer many years before Nixon warned that "The President who stops the Vietnam war or even tries too, will not see his full term of office.. Very prophetic.<br>

The Photographer who took those images and the scurvy, ugly people who published and all who bought this garbage, a pox on their house!</p>

[allan_jamieson2]

<p>It would really seem like the Royal protection people messed up big time. Yes, they were a long way away from the spot where they were photographed from and they probably thought they were in a private spot. But, it could have been a sniper taking shots at them, rather than a photographer spying on them. All things considered they got off rather lightly, embarrassed yes but still alive.</p>

<p>The reaction in the British press compared these pics to the treatment that Princess Dianna got from the press in her lifetime. Remember the circumstances behind her death and you might understand why William looks on press photographers less than fondly.</p>