charles_eliason1 Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 <p>I've decided to focus on using XTOL as my primary developer and have started film testing Tmax 400 to determine my development time. I exposed several rolls of Tmax 400 120 using my typical method. I had intended to use XTOL at 1:1, however I got distracted and developed several rolls with XTOL undiluted.<br>So, now that I have development times for XTOL at 1:1 and straight, can anyone give me any advice on when to use XTOL straight and when I might want to use XTOL diluted 1:1 ?<br>Also, does anyone have a suggestion for any other film that they believe is particular suited for developing with XTOL ?</p><p>Thanks,<br>Charles</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_norman2 Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 <p>If your testing results in too short development times with straight XTOL, then use the 1+1 or 1+2 dilutions. Dilutions are useful in dealing with plus and minus zone system processing. Personally, I use 1+1 and 1+2 dilutions, rather than straight XTOL.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tim gray Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 <p>I use 1:1 for two main reasons - longer, more manageable development times, and I get twice as much film developed out of a single batch.</p> <p>The other reasons, more film speed, less solvent affect, sharper grain, etc., are really great and desirable to me, but I can't say that I've ever run a side by side test with full strength XTOL to see how visible they actually are. The two reasons I mentioned first probably have a bigger impact on my photography :) But I like to think 1:1 benefits my film in visible ways.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian_gordon_bilson Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 <p>If you,perchance,have kept that used batch of Xtol stock you are pretty close to discovering the joys of 'seasoned Xtol'.<br> If you continue to use it,adding 80ml of fresh stock for each film,it becomes 'Replenished Xtol'<br> You can expect finer grain,higher sharpness,and higher economy than 1:1. The film I used to compare the two methods was Fuji Neopan 400. Two 5x7in prints from 12x16in scale enlargements proved the point to me.<br> You can read the threads on Apug.org for the finer points of replenishment.<br> Xtol should be just fine with any b&w film on the market.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulie_smith1 Posted February 11, 2012 Share Posted February 11, 2012 <p>Though Kodak no longer recommends it they used to tell us Xtol 1:3 was excellent. Having processed much 4x5, 5x7 and 8x10 film using it at 1:3 I prefer the dilution. Works well.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now