rgrambo Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 <p>I posted this under Ultra Large Format, too, but didn't want all of you to miss it:<br> http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/19/film-camera-measures-35-feet-long/</p> <p>Kind of makes me want to stop whining about the weight of my camera gear!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walter_degroot Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 <p>At ITT in nutley nj 1972,<br> they had a camera that was capable of 20 x 24 inches.<br> the back was in a darkroom and the front was in the next room<br> it looked like a giant view camera<br> the lens was 3: in diameter and they uses carbon ARC lights.<br> the front standard was motorized.<br> the "film holder" had a vacuum to keep the film flat.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rgrambo Posted January 20, 2012 Author Share Posted January 20, 2012 <p>I see Rick Drawbridge was way ahead of me on this. See his "Top of My Christmas List" thread below!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_sunley Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 <p>Looks like it is made from parts from a lithography plate camera for a broadsheet newspaper.<br> Most large newspapers had one in the 1970's.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_jones3 Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 Whoever made the mockup wasn't much of a photographer or historian. The real camera (if ever finished) will be different. Dennis Manarchy's camera is much too late. More impressive is the camera George R. Lawrence had built in 1900, the age of iron men and wooden cameras <a href="http://robroy.dyndns.info/lawrence/mammoth.html" target="_blank">http://robroy.dyndns.info/lawrence/mammoth.html</a>. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_barts2 Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 Large, but not even close to the largest camera: http://www.fastmediamagazine.com/blog/2011/07/18/the-world’s-largest-camera-is-the-size-of-an-aircraft-hangar/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winfried_buechsenschuetz1 Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 <p>I remember I once met a guy who told me that his father had a company making cameras to produce the printing plates for advertising panels, these cameras must have had a similar film format.<br> Cameras for the printing business may have extreme dimensions, and cameras stretching over two rooms (one of them rather a darkroom for inserting the plates, focussing etc.) are not unusual in that business.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_sunley Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 <p>They also used "sunshine in a bottle" lamps like this Philips250 watt CSI bulb<br> http://www.lamptech.co.uk/Spec%20Sheets/Philips%20CSI250.htm<br> 15,000 lumens, bright. :)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kris-bochenek Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 <p>The company I work for aquired NuArc (the division where I work) and I know they made some cameras back in the 60's and 70's pretty interesting stuff.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ron_gratz Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 <p>Let me know when the digital version comes out.<br> Ron Gratz</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starvy Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 <p>They should stick a Canon APS C sensor inside that rig.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_mann1 Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 <p>It's so yesterday unless it comes with a button to post the image automatically to Facebook.</p> <p>;-)</p> <p>Tom M</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User_4525289 Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 <p>it is digital</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charles_stobbs3 Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 A few more like this and Kodak will be back in business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jay_de_fehr Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 <p>The massive size of the (illustrated) camera is a consequence of a person working inside the camera along with all the automation/animatronics. It's an ambitious project, considering the following:<br> Each exposure will use the equivalent of 43 sheets of 8x10 film, with current prices for 8x10 B&W film in the $6-$10/ sheet range. <br> The lens will need to project an image circle over 7' in diameter. <br> The reproduction ratio looks to be about 4:1. I'm not sure how to get adequate dof under those conditions, but if it's possible, it will require a LOT of light. <br> I imagine the resulting negatives will be "scanned" by a MFD camera and stitched together, then printed in strips, like a billboard, to form the 13' x 20' prints. </p> <p>I can't begin to calculate the cost of such a project. Grandiose doesn't begin to describe the scale of it. I'll be surprised, and very impressed if it comes off. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User_4136860 Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 <p>What does the neck strap look like ?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a._t._burke Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 <p>Ms. Grambo...</p> <p>Do you know who makes the film?</p> <p>A. T. Burke</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jay_de_fehr Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 <p>"Do you know who makes the film?" <em>Almost</em> certainly Kodak. It would be quite ironic if the photographer had to shoot his American project on foreign film. Kodak has a $15,000 minimum order for custom cut film, but at appx $400/ sheet, the project should be able to meet that easily, given the scope of their plan. I wonder who's footing the bill for this project?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob_the_waste Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 <p>Better get it while the getting is good. :-)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now