michael_barnes5 Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 <p>I'm thinking of grabbing a Kodak Retina IIIs + Curtagon 35mm f/2.8. <br> Anyone have experience with this lens? Is this a good lens to use wide-open? Any samples?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dhbebb Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 <p>I have one but have not tested it. This<br> http://www.schneiderkreuznach.com/archiv/pdf/wechsel_objektive.pdf<br> reveals it to be a 6-element design - in view of its age, one would expect medium contrast, good central sharpness wide open and passable edge sharpness reaching maximum 2 to 3 stops down. The Retina IIIs can be a nice camera, if not used or serviced recently the shutter may well be gummy and the viewfinder is nothing special - you'll need a supplementary VF for 35mm.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelging Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 <p>I had a IIIs with all the lenses and sold it about a year ago. It(35mm curtagon) was a good lens, with nice contrast and sharpness. Did not shoot it wide open, so can't talk about that part of it. Will look for a photo shot with it. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jean_moxhet Posted February 24, 2012 Share Posted February 24, 2012 <p>Just started to build a (double) set Kodak Retina IIIs + Voigtlander Bessamatic ("m" model). Now after modification of the Retina lenses to be usable on the Bessamtic, I have to finish cleaning all of them (Retina: Curtagon 24/4, Curtagon 35/2.8, Xenar 50/2.8, Tele-Xenar 135/4 ; Bessamatic: Skoparex 35/3.4, Color Skopar X 50/2.8, Color Lanthar 50/2.8) .<br> I still have to finish first rolls but first impression, both camera are fabulous piece of 50's technology same for lenses and accessories. The Retina is really a great rangefinder just shame it's not fitted with same apperture/speed setting as on the Bessamatic.<br> Regarding lenses, long minimum distance with the Tele-Xenar is quite a pain. And no luck, my Curtagon 35 was accidented but as I had it for free nobody to blame. For sure after some mcgyverism I'll be able to use it but not sure of quality vs perfect exemplar ;-)<br> Oh, I nearly forget, the Curtagon 28 is a beauty by it self. It can be keept as display object under its clear plastic bubble box on my desk... but not a good solution because I'll spent too much time looking at it ;-)<br> Waiting to see pics posted here! And waiting to find time for some shooting.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dhbebb Posted February 24, 2012 Share Posted February 24, 2012 <p><em>Regarding lenses, long minimum distance with the Tele-Xenar is quite a pain</em><br> As you may know, Kodak sold 2 special close-up lenses to allow closer focusing</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now