Nikon F

[q.g._de_bakker]

<i>"Absolutely true, but since this is a Classic Cameras forum, rather than [...]"</i><br><br>Hear, hear!<br>Glad to see a True Classic enjoying much well-deserved attention. Doesn't happen too often here. ;-)

[Brad Cloven]

<p>Nikon F-series Camera Porn just isn't complete without this baby:</p>

<p>\<img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3435/3856259136_61af6625fb_z.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="425" /></p>

[david_carroll4]

<p>Yum! My all time favorite SLR.</p>

[cary_chin1]

<p>Great to see another Nikon F being used instead of being stuck in a display case! Today I am using mine for some documentation photography at the Nike Missile Museum near San Francisco.</p>

[User_5050610]

<p>Matthew Currie--thanks very much for the tip re Vermont Camera repair!<br>

The prism is very bright; just dusty.<br>

I'll contact them and thanks again!<br>

Paul </p>

[jason]

<p>i bought a Nikon-F in 1970. Added a second body in !971.Slightly used. The cameras have always worked. One jam in all the years. a few Nikkor lenses dismantled themselves after very long trans-continental flights. No matter how worn and ugly the "F" looks, it will work..<br>

Glad to see a shot of a F3 here..It's nothing like an F. I use mine but we've never bonded. Go figger!I never liked my EOS system Perfectly reliable. Great exposures, sometimes mis-focussed.<br>

A prism very expensive. The added Ftn finder working or not, is usually brighter than the prism, being newer. Thats relative at this point in time.<br>

The classic Nikon-F is almost the perfect camera. The F2 better but only after '74. There were some bugs. So beware of an unsused 74..... number. A small CTR would correct any bugs.</p>