john_a5 Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 <p>There are a lot of shady practices in photography and most recognize the upskirt photo as being one of the shadiest.</p> <p>Well, here is a new twist on that that I believe any photographer could get into ;)). Go to the 3rd thumbnail in the link below and the 4th will clarify it. <strong>THIS IS COMPLETELY SAFE FOR WORK! </strong>(1/2 of you will probably not click through now!)<strong><br /></strong></p> <p>http://www.stephenberkman.com/installations/awanderingeye/index.htm</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joseph_wisniewski Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 <p>I think the reference is way too obscure for most people.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_a5 Posted April 21, 2011 Author Share Posted April 21, 2011 <p>Camera <strong>Obscure</strong>(a)?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_h.1 Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 <p>Don't quit your day job.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starvy Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 <p>I can't afford to quit the day job ;)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigpjenkinsphotography Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 <p>I'm going out to the workshop right now!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_a5 Posted April 21, 2011 Author Share Posted April 21, 2011 <p>Craig, add a bustle to the design and you will increase your headroom......</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lex_jenkins Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 <p>That "Wandering Eye" would need a bustle that big.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richardsperry Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 Old twist? Or new? I think it's a fabrication. Kind of alternative history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colin carron Posted April 22, 2011 Share Posted April 22, 2011 <p>The truth is only a little less absurd than these made-up concelaed cameras. In Victorian times Lancaster made a Handbag camera and a pocket watch camera. Other cameras were disguised as piles of book, binocularss and a bowler hat. There was also of course the ever-popular (at least among the misted-up-spectacles brigade) 'concealed oblique' lens fitting which allowed the shooter to shoot sideways to the apparent line of the camera. Possibly the finest example of this tendency in was the Skaife Pistolgraph of 1856. This was hardly a point and shoot as it used wet plate technology, but Thomas Skaife managed to get himself arrested while taking a photo of Queen Victoria. The most famous of these cameras is the Thomson Revolver camera.</p> <p><a href="http://www.historiccamera.com/historiccameras/historiccameras4.html">http://www.historiccamera.com/historiccameras/historiccameras4.html</a></p> <p>Truth is usually stranger than fiction.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User_4136860 Posted April 22, 2011 Share Posted April 22, 2011 <p>I'm not interested in UP Skirt Photography, because it could result in a nasty crack up.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now