EOS 5Dmk3 or EOS 3D

[chiny_t]

<p>Hello<br>

Is it possible that the next canon body to be announced will be EOS 3D instead of EOS 5D mk3.<br>

Just a thought, cheer.</p>

[robin_sibson1]

<blockquote>

<p>Just a thought</p>

</blockquote>

<p>Scarcely qualifies as one, and certainly it isn't acceptable to clutter up this forum with such rubbish. Moderator! Moderator!</p>

[nathangardner]

<p>whichever it is, no one should purchase a camera until it is released, because it will most certainly make every camera up to this point obsolete.</p>

[KenPapai]

<p>For sure.... nearly anything's possible:<br>

7D2 or a 5D3 or a 3D... Perhaps a 90% chance one of those three happens later this year.<br>

Check back in Oct. to remonstrate me.</p>

[PuppyDigs]

<p>I'm still waiting for the EOS 666D. </p>

[dan_south]

<p>I'm saving up for the 5D Mark 9.</p>

[nathangardner]

<p>You may not want to buy that Dan, I hear the Mark 10 will be due out shortly after and will be a MAJOR upgrade.</p>

[philip_wilson]

<p>I want a single digit even number I am sick of odd numbers like 1, 3, 5, 7. The only even numbers we get are 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, 620, 630 etc... Why do they not produce high end even numbered cameras - I want the EOS 2D</p>

[bob_king2]

<p>5D3. I think Canon will maintain the 5Dx line. On the other hand I've given up trying to follow Nikon's model numbering logic. By the way, the entry level 600D should be out soon...</p>

<p>Cheers, Bob</p>

[w_t1]

<p>spam</p>

[damian_tinsley]

<p>Although I love the idea of a 3D, it's really hard to see where this would sit in the line-up of a 5D3 without stealing a lot of thunder from the 1 series cameras. So my bet would be on a 5D3. PS Enjoyable speculation though meaningless in any real context given how capable is the 5D series.</p>

[lkld]

<p>Ouch....tough crowd!</p>