patrick_f Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 <p>Dave - you have been completely exposed as a liar and a faker. Please go away. So when exactly did you take those photos? How come there is no record of you at Getty? Honestly, I feel sorry for you in a weird way. It really must be sad to live such a pathetic existence that you are forced to attempt acceptance from complete strangers via means of blatant lies and a lousy attempt to present yourself as something you are certainly NOT. Dave, I am going to be the one to say it - you are a liar, pure, plain, and simple. Maybe one day you will find true identity and feel secure with yourself, and I hope so. It is not healthy to build an "online persona" based completely around Bovine Scatology. Seriously - sooner or later you are going to completely loose grip of reality if you do not reel yourself in now. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mariosforsos Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 <p>Patrick, let's not waste any more time with this person. He does not deserve it.</p> <p>And seriously, IF the inflection was that the portraits in the Getty screenshot WERE Dave's, then you're most probably right...he is, unfortunately, a liar and not a very good one. ANY photographer who's ever SHOT anything can immediately see through...</p> <p>Pity...who knows, maybe it'll take a lawsuit by one of the celebrities he's allegedly shot to wake him up...</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_jacobs2 Posted November 5, 2010 Author Share Posted November 5, 2010 <p>marios, it wasn't enough that you fabricated information in your post, after i confronted you about it you repeated the same missinformation again, in the next post?...and now you dare to threaten me and then say what a friendly group photo net is?<br> you and patrick are total morons, and i don't mean that in a rude way, get lost...<br> you've already been reported.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patrick_f Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 <p>lol. ok. Marios and I have actual real experience and knowledge to contribute....I will be happy to go away from a troll like yourself because like Marios stated "lets not waste any more time with this person. He does not deserve it". I was thinking the same thing. I am here to help people, educate, become educated, and contribute. I am sorry that it has devolved into this, but somehow I assume you had zero intention as to receiving an intelligent answer. All of your posts seem to be of this nature - ignorant questions posed by someone who knows absolutely nothing of what they are talking about seeking of a self important (ego boosting response to the lie) reply. Like if I were to go on the Ferrari Fans Website and ask "what kind of gas do I put in my Enzo?". Luckily I am not the one who has to live with it - but you are the one who has to look himself in the mirror.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newmanuk Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 refer to previous post january 2009. no response then. why plugging it all again dave? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadforth_stephen Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 <p>Go to Jail...do not pass go.<br> We have a government watchdog down here who would love to look at this. Its called IP Australia.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_jacobs2 Posted November 5, 2010 Author Share Posted November 5, 2010 <p>thank you all for your assistance, name calling, slander and hate..<br> fwiw, my contour page happens to be authentic and is posted on the net.<br> favorite post:.. "Pnet is a friendly, collaborative place and everyone who answers does so purely out of interest and is always well meaning." quote, marios.<br> i'm done reading the thread...i wish you all instant karma.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshroot Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 <p>This is actually a pretty funny thread. I've been on PN for over a dozen years and I don't think I have ever seen such a terrible reaction to so much excellent advice.</p> <p>To the PN regulars, kudos for giving very good advice to someone so completely unwilling to listen.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denniswms Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 <p>I always arrive after the party is over. Not having read the middle 80% of the thread may leave me at a disadvantage but in response to the original post:</p> <p>It is not the agent or gallery owner who sells famous celebrity images it is either the renown of the photographer through a lifetime of photographic work i.e. Ritts, Weber, Avedon, Leibovitz- fame of the person for work in another medium (usually acting) who then puts out a book of images shooting their friends or people they're working with- or least common, fame of the subject, invariably dead, recent books of Monroe (the last shoot) and Elvis (early pre war career B&Ws) come to mind.</p> <p>The prohibitive cost of high quality photobooks-exhibition prints too for that matter- often require a sponsor/charitable cause to be involved. I have found books from a pro photographer to likely be in line with couture collections from fashion designers, i.e. more for support/ servicing of the brand than for outright profit. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig_gillette Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 <p>I'm wondering how the book sold? </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now