fino Posted September 16, 2002 Share Posted September 16, 2002 Can anyone give me a suggestion as to how I can correct this problem. I accidentally underexposed a roll of Reala [iSO 100] by not adjusting my exposure for a Polarizer filter that has a filter factor of 2.3 to 2.8 [say 2.5] What ISO should I get the lab to rate it as? The roll contains some bright [i hope] landscapes and seascapes. Any suggestions appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
art_haykin Posted September 16, 2002 Share Posted September 16, 2002 A 2.5 stop push on ISO 100 would be 600. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justin_kern Posted September 16, 2002 Share Posted September 16, 2002 You are going to have a ton of exposure latitude with Reala, so you may be able to get away with pushing 1.5 or 2 stops plus some adjustment when printing. Hope this helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m0002a Posted September 16, 2002 Share Posted September 16, 2002 Strangely enough filter factors are different than stops. A filter factor of 2 is 1 stop, a filter factor of 4 is 2 stops, a filter factor of 8 is 3 stops, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_s. Posted September 16, 2002 Share Posted September 16, 2002 Fintan, were you using an SLR? If so, you didn't underexpose the film because the in-camera light meter was reading light thru the filter. In that case, you wouldn't have to tell them to compensate at the lab, just have them develop the film normally. You would only have to compensate if you were using a TLR or rangefinder camera, or metering with a handheld meter, or otherwise not metering thru the lens and filter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patrick_ingram Posted September 16, 2002 Share Posted September 16, 2002 If you were using ttl metering, your exposure is ok (as mentioned above) as the meter was looking though the filter. Otherwise... a filter factor of 2.5 corresponds to 1.32 stops, not 2.5 stops. So go for a +1 and 1/3 stop push, or a film speed rating of 250 ISO (2.5 * 100). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fino Posted September 17, 2002 Author Share Posted September 17, 2002 Sorry I should have mentioned that I was using a manual camera and a handheld meter so unfortunatly a TTL meter wont save me this time. I came across this Filter Factor conversion table http://www.geocities.com/thombell/filterfactor.htmlso I'm thinking of ISO 250 as sugested by Patrick Ingram, but I'll wait a few days and see any other suggestions. Thanks for the replies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fino Posted September 23, 2002 Author Share Posted September 23, 2002 As sugested I rated as 250 ISO and they came out fine, thanks to all who posted and to Patrick Ingram. Another happy customer! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now