mendel_leisk Posted January 2, 2010 Share Posted January 2, 2010 <p>We went to see this last night, a good story, well worth seeing.</p> <p>One thing I noticed, it was a real celebration of bokeh: many dreamy out-of-focus back and fore ground shots, and the occasional focus shift. One shot of a long line of glass goblets where the focus "pans" along. Some shots in a garden, with subjects in foreground and way out-of-focus conical shrubs behind, had me wondering if they were using slight tilt-and-shift.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted January 2, 2010 Share Posted January 2, 2010 <p>Wasn't this kind of thing recently cited as an example of being a little "over-committed" to photography?</p> <p>I suspect that looking at the bokeh would be the only way anyone would get me to go see the movie, though, so I am NOT casting stones here.....</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtk Posted January 2, 2010 Share Posted January 2, 2010 <p>Good observation. In fact, bokeh and shifting focus seem to drive the opening sequences. I asked myself, why is this so beautiful?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colin carron Posted January 2, 2010 Share Posted January 2, 2010 <p>I am in two minds about films where the photography forces itself on my attention. Part of me is thinking 'that is a very good effect' while the other part is a bit annoyed my attention has been distracted from the story. I can't particularly remember the sequences you mention from 'Young Victoria' so clearly they didn't obtrude too much for my taste. I seem to remember the general effect was similar to the Merchant/Ivory school of film and generally pleasing.</p> <p>Other films which I can think of which use interesting photographic techniques are 'Barry Lyndon' by Kubrick where the photography and the soundtrack tend to dwarf the story and the recent 'Star Trek'movie where the use of flare I thought worked well.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mendel_leisk Posted January 2, 2010 Author Share Posted January 2, 2010 <blockquote> <p>I can't particularly remember the sequences you mention from 'Young Victoria' so clearly they didn't obtrude too much for my taste.</p> </blockquote> <p>That was my feeling, it wasn't overdone or obtrusive.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpo3136b Posted January 2, 2010 Share Posted January 2, 2010 <p>There was a set of documentaries, history programs really, on PBS which used out of focus techniques to pretty good effect. The show was called The Ascent of Money. It was narrated by Niall Ferguson.<br /> http://www.pbs.org/wnet/ascentofmoney/category/video/</p> <p>This blogger uses out of focus techniques quite a bit. She will usually put text over the top of the photos (usually a homemade poem). Like the technique in the documentary above, the photos will be out of focus enough to be blurry, but often in focus just enough to communicate what they are a picture of. <br> http://itsjusthowiseethings.blogspot.com/</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtk Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 <p>Niall Ferguson's piece was excellent, but I thought the focus technique was over-done :-)<br> Still, it served the purpose beautifully. Matter of taste. Enviable work. Wish it was mine :-)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now