mcblue Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 <p>I didn't notice it at first but now that I looked at the prints of my 5th test roll, I noticed that the composition shifted somewhat to the left side. I realized this because there were a couple of shots were I was very, very careful in creating a symmetrical composition. For a couple of shots in particular, I put the Mat on a table so took a few minutes to carefully compose. Is this common a common anomaly in the Yashica Mat 124G's or TLR's in general?</p><p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diegobuono Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 <p>It's aTLR, the image recorded come from a lens positioned lower than the one used to compose, this is a "parallax error" and is noticeable in close range picture.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobey_bilek Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 <p>Paralax can give an up down error, not left right.</p> <p>The taking lens and viewing lens are not set properly and I have no idea if this is adjustable.</p> <p>Mark Hama,com is a trained repair person on the TLR. </p> <p>Mat 124 is a fairly cheap low end camera and tolerences are greater than if you bought a Rollie . </p> <p>You also don`t know if this is a factory defect or if someone had it apart sometime in the past 50 years.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_momary Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 <p>Parallax is only possible in the vertical plane as implied above. Any left - right offset is due to alignment of lens elements or a 'bend' in the mirror of the viewing lens unit, i.e. shifting the view a bit.<br> I suppose that is correctable but may mitigate accurate focusing. The front panel of the camera comes off, with some effort, but that's a whole unit, not with independent adjustments. Might be best left to a pro or lived with.<br> This is my opinion and not verified by any real factual source.<br> Nice lil camera tho. :-)<br> Jim</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcblue Posted May 15, 2009 Author Share Posted May 15, 2009 <p>Thanks for the feedback. That's what I thought -- if it's a parallax error, the shift in composition is vertical not horizontal. I'll drop a note to Mark Hama...</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dustin McAmera Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 Since you mention the <i>prints</i>, it'd be worth checking the negatives, to see if the problem comes from cropping by whoever did the printing, before you look for a fault in the camera. I would have thought it would be hard to shift the image sideways by mounting one of the lenses wrongly, without doing something quite significant to the focusing behaviour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul ron Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 <p>Why don't you check the film plane to view finder? Putting a ground glass on the film plane then comparie the images?</p> The more you say, the less people listen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcblue Posted May 16, 2009 Author Share Posted May 16, 2009 <p>Thanks Pete and Paul.</p> <p>Pete, you're absolutely right. It was the printing. I saw one of my negatives off center, but I think that was my error as it was hand-held. I did check the negatives of the ones that were taken with the camera set on the table. The prints were cropped, and the composition was sound.</p> <p>Whew. Glad that I didn't try to have it fixed (I dropped an email to Mark Hama and he's on vacation by the way...). Shows what I know. Thanks again.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now