petr_turok Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 <p>Hey, you know someone with high end web fashion photo lighting<</p> <p>Thanks</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nathan_stiles Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 <p>Hmmm... lighting, as in equipment, or example work on their page? B/c on photo.net Matusciac Alex has some nice stuff in his fashion sections. Though fashion style varies greatly, so it may still not be what you are looking for.</p> <p><a href="http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=801023">http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=801023</a></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicaglow Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 <p>Yes.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davebell Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 <p>what an idiotic question.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davebell Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 <p>actually, it is even more idiotic as it is not actually a question.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john tonai Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 <p>web fashion?</p> <p>Stylish spiders?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nathan_stiles Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 <p>I'll butt in-- the OP's name is "Petr Turok", I'd have to assume he's from eastern europe, and english is not his first language. I'd further assume that as he ended w/ a `<', which is probably due to having a non-english keyboard.</p> <p>I'd bet that all the jesters are either American or British, about the only countries in the world that routinely speak one language, and thus couldn't come that close to the proper grammer if they needed to ask this question in Petr's language.</p> <p>I'd say w/ some fairly easy decyphering that Petr meant:<br> "Does anyone know of a web page with some high end fashion photography and lighting?"</p> <p>Granted, even though I am American, my company is Luxembourgese, my program director is latin, my director is Danish, my CEO is Belgium, and my escalation point is German-- oh, and of course I'm the escalation point for some Indians; so, it may be easier for me to figure this out and I could be over estimating my fellow readers. However, this is an international medium, and we should try to help when possible, and pause for some consideration before ridicule-- which breaks the PN forum posting guidelines and rules.</p> <p>I'll field any further rebutts on behalf of Thorir. And may I point out that each of you mocked, after I decoded Petr's message. What say ye, <strong>Thorir</strong>? </p> <p>And no straw man argument pointing out you are not American, or one other small, irrelivant incorrect assumption. The assumptions were a preface, and not the point.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davebell Posted March 14, 2009 Share Posted March 14, 2009 <p>propoer grammer..... "my CEO is Belgium" mmmmmm, wrong. My CEO is Belgian!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davebell Posted March 14, 2009 Share Posted March 14, 2009 <p>proooper or propper, answering a question when phrased as the OP did is impossible. We are not here to try to decipher the OPs mesage or question. If language is a problem he should either get someone to help him, or post on a forum in his own language. Obviously there is a lot of leeway but this particular one is beyong the relams of understanding.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nathan_stiles Posted March 14, 2009 Share Posted March 14, 2009 <p>Oh come on-- give me some fun here. David, you gave me nothing. You feel into almost the cookie cutter pattern of weak come backs. I rarely take the time to argue w/ anyone other than Ellis about equipment, so make this exciting please.</p> <p>Rule number 1 of weak come backs: point out errors in anything that is not germane to the topic; such as spelling and proper grammer. Distract the readers from the fact you have nothing valid, and hope the other person's lack of proof reading makes him seem impossible of being correct.</p> <p>Yet, it's old and tired-- at least you did come back w/ something... and to that:</p> <p>First, I decyphered it. And... I decyphered it before you replied; so I decyphered it for you. Or perhaps my response still left you spinning as to what the OP wanted? So the question is in the realm of understanding (since I could figure it out), but I do accept your comment that it is beyond _your_ realm of understanding. To that, let's proceed...</p> <p>Second, if you are encapable of understanding the question, it is by far quicker to hit the back button, instead of typing a hateful response. Or... and this is advanced problem solving: you could rephrase and/or ask the OP to clear up your mistunderstandings? The point is, there's no reason to be a winkle on here, b/c of a badly phrased question.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tony_palmieri4 Posted March 15, 2009 Share Posted March 15, 2009 <p>Aftir reeding oll uv the bantir I theenk that this sight nedes a spell chek opshun......just mi opinyun!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cole_bennett1 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 <p>Oh my goodness.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
douglas_price Posted April 17, 2009 Share Posted April 17, 2009 <p>Lets assume he means examples of solid lighting work, and get on with it.</p> <p>http://www.eoloperfido.com/<br> http://www.qstra.pl/</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now