think27 Posted February 9, 2009 Author Share Posted February 9, 2009 <p>No need to apologize... It gave us a chance to clarify why imges that won still have some critique attached. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isa Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 <p>The best congrats to our winners and good uck to their works !!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjferron Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 <p>Must have been a tough choice. These could all be interchangeable in placing as far as I'm concerned.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not Here Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 <p>Congratulations to Jill, Bryce and Dennis; and thanks to the judges for having this contest. My very first time to participate in a photo contest, and the review of these images daily and anticipation of the final judging was quite a thrill... Mike</p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografz Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 <p>One thing that impressed me was the over-all quality of work from the less than 3 year group of shooters. Very well done all, and a big thumbs up to the winners. </p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manuel barrera houston, Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 <p>Congratulations ye all,</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc453 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 <p>Congratulations to all the winners. There is some very good work here. Marc Williams photo was the standout photo for me. Three cheers to the judges too.<br> Marcus Sr.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KenPapai Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 <p>Congrats again to the excellent photos that won...totally worth it and you ought to be prouder than ever.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Gardner Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 <p>Congratulations too all who participated....and congrats to the winners. Those shots were excellent in their right. For shooters under three years....i was very impressed!....and i don't impress easily.</p> <p>Dave.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_shilling__sacramento_ Posted February 11, 2009 Share Posted February 11, 2009 <p>I thought for sure that Marc Williams was the breakaway star in this one... The winner obviously stood out as well, but Matc's photo was epic. I would want it on the last page of my album!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ejder Posted February 11, 2009 Share Posted February 11, 2009 <p>I'm disappointed that my shot wasn't even in the running, considering that it didn't seem to show any of the specific flaws like background/object intersection with heads, skin blemishes, or any improper subject cropping (all of which I do take pains to avoid). My image was planned, exposed a certain way on purpose and processed a certain way on purpose. I guess interaction between two or more people was a necessary element to the judges, because that's the only thing the winning shots consistently have in common that my shot lacked.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laguy2 Posted February 11, 2009 Share Posted February 11, 2009 <p>Congrats to the winners....how/where can I see all the entries?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
think27 Posted February 11, 2009 Author Share Posted February 11, 2009 <p>Al - here they are</p> <p><a rel="nofollow" href="00SDBW">http://www.photo.net/wedding-photography-forum/00SDBW</a><br> <a rel="nofollow" href="00SDBr">http://www.photo.net/wedding-photography-forum/00SDBr</a></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laguy2 Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 <p>Thanks Mary,<br> Judges had to make some tough choices in both categories. I don't necessary agree with all their choices after reviewing the candidates, as each image brings out different emotion in the eye of the beholder. Their choices struck them different then me and I completely respect that and their choices. When will this "contest" be run again?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
say cheese1664882539 Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 <p>Congrats to the winners, they are technically and artistically sound.</p> <p>Looking back over the entries, I should have waited to see the others first.<br> My entry was what I thought at the time to be all encompassing of her wedding day.<br> Beautiful scenery, the wedding party, bride and groom about to walk into the light...</p> <p>In hindsight, I had images that were more in the vein of what I'm seeing as the judges choice.</p> <p>Maybe a contest that covers the many individual categories (details, bridal, ceremony, etc..)<br> My .02</p> <p>Cheers</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
think27 Posted February 13, 2009 Author Share Posted February 13, 2009 <p>Al, William - We'll probably run the contest again next year. We try and do this every February. Not likely to break it down into categories... Too complicated and time consuming for volunteer judges. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
think27 Posted February 13, 2009 Author Share Posted February 13, 2009 <p>Al, William - We'll probably run the contest again next year. We try and do this every February. Not likely to break it down into categories... Too complicated and time consuming for volunteer judges. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now