jenkins Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 <p>Could somebody tell me the best way to darken skies, took this tonight as a test and the sky seems to not have a very uniform colour to it, if i increase the brightness it becomes very apparent and patchy.<br> I know this must have something to do with layers and i was wondering how you might go about this as selection in the way i would go about this usually would be difficult with this picture.<br> I applied a layer to the picture but it was overall and changed the colour of everything, i just want to darken the sky nothing else.<br> Thanks<br> Simon.</p> <p><a href="http://s89.photobucket.com/albums/k223/gorringeman/?action=view¤t=test-1.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k223/gorringeman/test-1.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket" /></a></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_werner Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 <p>Simon,</p> <p>Actually I think Curves might work better for you here. Are you in Photoshop? Try moving the left quarter of the curve downward and see how that works for you.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenkins Posted January 27, 2009 Author Share Posted January 27, 2009 <p>Hey Chris<br> I tried Curves, but as its a nightshot i seem to start losing image on the bridge towers, very fine line, i would like to get the sky as dark as possible, it must be light pollution.<br> I know it needs a bit of noise reduction, but this was straight out of the camera.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Michael Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 <p>An option:<br> <br> 1: Curves - knock out the blue only (most of the sky) and then increase the Brightness<br> <br> 2. Filter 85 at about 40% to correct the cast from the street lights.<br> <br> The two images are a rough only, just to test my theory – seems a plan IMO.<br> <br> WW</p> <p > </p> <div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenkins Posted January 28, 2009 Author Share Posted January 28, 2009 <p>Thanks for the examples William, i was hoping to keep the original colour though, the second one is closer but still has a red cast to it. I played around with this picture, reduced some noise and applied a layer, then i had to increase the highlights, although it has helped the sky the lights have become a little too much.<br> I have this problem every now and then, so i was looking for a selective way to adjust just the sky.</p> <p><a href="http://s89.photobucket.com/albums/k223/gorringeman/?action=view¤t=use-5.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k223/gorringeman/use-5.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket" /></a></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Michael Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 <p><em><strong>"the second one is closer but still has a red cast to it. "</strong></em><br /><br />I think you might have misunderstood my post.<br /><br />The first image I posted was after "stage 1" just using the curves to knock out the blue as I described. <br /><br />The second image I posted was after I used the 85 filter at 40% . . .<br> I am suggesting that playing with the "amount" at both of these two stages might work, the above images were just a rough first attempt - about one minute's work - I understood you wanted to keep the colour</p> <p>Cheers <br> <br />WW<br /></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenkins Posted January 28, 2009 Author Share Posted January 28, 2009 <p>I do understand William, its just doing what you said will affect things overall, i am still not very happy with the picture i put back up if i look at it closely, its only an exercise, but displaced light in the sky at night, can be a bit tricky for me in PP.<br> Even if i could floor the Curves in the sky region it still leaves a very slight patch of difference.<br> I suppose get it as dark as you can and clone the areas that you are happy with could be a possibility?<br> Or get it right in the first place ;)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Michael Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 <p><em><strong>"I do understand William, its just doing what you said will affect things overall"</strong></em><br> <br> Got it, Thanks for the reply.<br> <br> <em><strong>"Or get it right in the first place"</strong></em><br> <br> I have been thinking about that and your earlier comment about pollution, I wonder if a Circular Polarizing Filter on the lens would have helped? <br> <br> If you can try that, I think an exposure bracket in 1/2 stops (-1.0 to +2.0) would be a good idea: even though you work with the RAW file, it would be good to have spread from which to chose, IMO.<br> <br> WW</p> <p > </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenkins Posted January 28, 2009 Author Share Posted January 28, 2009 <p><em><strong>I wonder if a Circular Polarizing Filter on the lens would have helped?</strong></em><br> Do you know that's funny you should say that, i have only recently started taking it off for night shots thinking it would kill what little light there was. I am sure i read something saying it was a bad idea, that's what made me do it.<br> This could well be the answer and i will go back to the same spot and try that, it really does make sense.<br> Thanks for the idea WW</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now