g_c4 Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 <p>I shoot mostly slide film (Provia 100F and 400X), so don't know much about print film. That said, I frequently am attempting to shoot pictures of family and friends in mixed indoor lighting.<br> For example, my living room is a mix of halogen and fluorescent. Sometimes with flash. I also frequently shoot in rooms light by tungsten, and augment with flash.<br /> <br /> Are any of the print films more "forgiving" of mixed lighting, especially for skin tones? I was thinking perhaps Portra 160NC or 400. Any advice from those who have a lot of experience shooting print film in mixed lighting?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobcossar Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 <p>Absolute best is Fuji's Reala. Second choice would be Fuji's NPH Cheers, Bob</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_kuhne Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 <p>Fuji's Superia Xtra 400 and 800 ISO are especially formulated for mixed lighting. I have found them to be very good. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patrick_mont Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 <p>I think you might have been right. Give Portra 400 a try. You will probably want 400 NC (natural color) not 400 VC (vivid color) but it is up to you. Good Luck. Patrick</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Ingold Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 <p>The most forgiving film for mixed lighting is B&W. There are times you simply can't fix things in post unless you convert to B&W. The other solution is to match lighting. If you use a flash, use a gel to match its color temperature with the environment. Unfortunately, many large spaces use metal vapor lights to save energy costs. These lights do not have a continuous spectrum and are nearly impossible to dial out or match. That's the time to break out Tri-X.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_miller10 Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 <p>Fuji Reala. When I was shooting architecture Reala constantly amazed me with how well it did in mixed light source environments. Reala has a cyan dye layer that other negative films don't have.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matthew_newton Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 <p>Reala seems to do a pretty darned good job in mixed lighting, as does Superia 400 and 800. The worst I'll see is a very warm cast from tungsten or Flourescent (CFL) lighting. As an example of mixed lighting, this is a picture with mixed Tungsten (the lights on the tree), a CFL off frame to the right (a 60w equivelent on the otherside of the room) and natural light from a sliding glass door to the left (dusk and overcast, so very blue natural lighting). Superia 400.<br> Oh and the paint on the walls is a light/medium blue color, just so you don't think there is a massive color cast on them.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paf iii Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 <p>When I used to shoot inside automotive dealerships The Lighting was completely mixed ,Fluorescent, tungsten, incandescent plus daylight I always shot with Reala.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_shriver Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 <p>The Fuji films that still have the "fourth layer" (cyan sensitive) are known to cope well with fluorescent lamps. However, they appear to be reformulating many of their films without that fourth layer. Read the package before buying.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randrew1 Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 <p>Portra 160 and 400 films were designed to accommodate mixed lighting. Reala does a good job as well.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_c4 Posted January 6, 2009 Author Share Posted January 6, 2009 <p>Thank you all very much. Very helpful advice, and some options I hadn't thought of.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manuel barrera houston, Posted January 6, 2009 Share Posted January 6, 2009 <p>Thank you all, as a guy who learned, is learning digital, who recently started emperimenting with film, this is a great thread for me. I learned a lot. Thanks and to the person who posed the question.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now