Chrome cross-processed then UN-cross-processed

[ned1]

OK, I just tried an experiment and I'm pretty happy with the results. Wondering

if anyone else is doing this.

 

I took my E-6 down to the local mini-lab to get it cross-processed (which they

had never heard of), scanned it, then did some radical color corrections to

return it to "normal". The result looks pretty close to straight chrome. Have

I discovered something new or is this a common technique.<div></div>

[roger_smith4]

Is there any benefit to this?

[ned1]

Yes. The nearest place that does E-6 from where I am now is a 90 minute drive!

[graybrick]

http://www.photo.net/photo/5693389

 

http://www.photo.net/photo/5660357

 

Did this a while back... The problem is, while you can get somewhat consistent results using the same film in the same lighting conditions, changing film and/or exposure levels will impact your results, sometimes in a fairly dramatic fashion. The color response of these films is also quite different when cross processed, and in certain situations you can lose tonality almost completely- see this link:

 

http://flickr.com/photos/screeminee/416071214/

 

So, in short, it can work, but I wouldn't depend on it in a situation where you're going to need reliable results.

[larrydressler]

Why not just use a film with more vivid color? . You can get the Chrome look with a C-41film like Ultra Color or if you can find it Agfa Vista. Also if you need to punch it up you already know how to use a computer as you have shown. I mail off my E6 or take it to Wal-Mart and get it back in 5 days.

 

Just a few thoughts.

 

Larry