zigzag Posted April 5, 2008 Share Posted April 5, 2008 I am (in Australia) doing Time For CD shoots whereby the model gives up her timein exchange for a Print or CD of images. The photographer takes the photographsand has copyright. What is then 'fair use' for the photo? i.e. would thesewords (extracted from an example model release) be OK?<br><br><i>1) The Subject permits the photographer and his/her licensees or assignees touse the photograph(s) and/or drawings therefrom and any other reproductions oradaptations therefrom either complete or in part alone or in conjunction withany wording and/or drawings for all uses including publicity and/ormerchandising and/or editorial purposes in any country. Unless otherwiseagreed the photograph(s) and any drawings or adaptations thereof shall be deemedto represent an imaginary person.</i><br><br><i>2) The photographer grants permission for the photographs to be used forpromotion by the Subject. The Subject agrees that usage is granted to use ofthe photograph for the following purposes only: Participation in a trainingexercise, including possible exposure to The Subject?s web galleries, and topromote The Subject by use in his/her portfolio, website and submissions. Wherepossible, photos published on-line will credit The Photographer. The Subjectmay not sell the photograph(s) or drawings so granted. </i><br><br> <i>The Subject understands that they do not have any interest in the copyrightof the photograph(s) or drawings nor shall receive any further payment.</i><br><br>i.e. the photographer gets all rights, the model is granted limited rights. Isthis fair/normal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyepasha Posted April 5, 2008 Share Posted April 5, 2008 You should check locally since local law governs the common law property, copy and use rights of the photographer vs. the photographee. However, I find the clauses above differ from the usual text found in most releases. My practice, just to throw in 2 cents, is to sign two contracts in the event of a TFP/TFCD arrangement. The first is a momdel release that assigns all rights to me, the photographer. This is the one I use for paid shoots and recognition of compensation received is a part of the contract. The second contract, in the event that I have bartered the pay rates in exchange for portfolio images is an end user license agreement with limited publication and copy rights for the model. I will send you both copies as PDF to your mail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigzag Posted April 5, 2008 Author Share Posted April 5, 2008 Thanks Paul - sounds like the above is the former whereas I should probably use the latter for TFCD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry_ Posted April 5, 2008 Share Posted April 5, 2008 "The Subject may not sell the photograph(s) or drawings so granted." This statement would allow the Subject to "give away" the images to be used by a third or fourth party, without penalty. And, of course, you would be the one to prove she (or he) did not gain $$$$$s from the "give away" -- if that should happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaleel_king Posted August 6, 2008 Share Posted August 6, 2008 Paul any chance I can get that PDF too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel_vivian2 Posted August 8, 2008 Share Posted August 8, 2008 Any chance I could get those PDFs as well? These are proving very popular, it seems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now