swann_kim Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 Hello all, I've just got an M3 from KEH today. But I found the viewfinder was cloudy. I called the KEH, and a sales rep told me that cloudy viewfinders are quite common for those old M3 (mine starts with the serial number 1014*** - so it's quite later one, as far as I know). When I look at the viewfinder from the eye-piece side, I can see a layer that looks like a film or trace when you pull off sticky tape (like the scotch tape). This layer seems to be just next to the eye piece. When I look at the viewfinder from the other side, I can still see the layer close to the eye piece. 1) Is this cloudy viewfinder a normal thing as its age considered ? I think it actually affects my picture taking ability in the end. This body is in EX (excellent) grade. I think this condition is not really fit for EX. 2) Or, can it be cleaned? Or is this a sign of irreversible deterioration? Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicaglow Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 Regardless of the serial number, that old of camera might well be clouded, especially if it hasn't been cleaned or serviced. Sure, you should probably do a CLA of it. Actually, when I buy equipment of higher value, I usually plan to spend money on a CLA anyway. That way I have a starting point for its maintenance. I can't really speak to the EX rating. If you're not happy though, I'd send it back. I think the EX refers more to the finish than the mechanics or cleanliness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanastonish Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 y halo thar, What an astute observation you've made! When I look through my M, the viewfinder from the angles you've described is nothing like what you've mentioned. :O For older model M cameras like the one you have, a cloudy viewfinder is anything but normal. It can be cleaned - but it can be expensive. If you want to keep your camera, and happen to decide that it needs servicing, I recommend Don Goldberg (DAG) and Sherry Krauter. All-in-all, I think you should send your camera back to the store! Who are they to tell you what is and isn't right, especially when you have the camera in front of you? First person observation FTW. :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mharris Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 Tough call Swann, KEH has one of the best return policies around but sometimes you have to expect a camera that old will need some cleaning. The good news is it can be fixed, the better news is it's worth it. In the end you'll have one of the best cameras ever made. Alan above mentioned two of the best around for fixing it up for you. In the end, to answer your question, I would keep it and get it fixed up. If you keep the CLA and repair receipts it will add to the value and useability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swann_kim Posted February 8, 2008 Author Share Posted February 8, 2008 Thank you so much for your advice all! I wonder if the layer I described in my question (one looks like a layer that covers the whole surface of the element very next to the eye piece) is a sign of the so-called balsam separation. I don't know what it is exactly, but, as far as I know, it is almost incurable problem of the M3 viewfinder. I can still see through the viewfinder. The layer's colour is somewhat milky. But, it is not a solid layer, but, a layer with many pores (clear-cloudy-clear-cloudy-and so on, and it's two dimensional). That's why I described it as trace of pulled-off sticky tape. If it can be cleaned and fixed, I would keep it. I wish someone really know this problem. Thanks again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mharris Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 It could be Swann the separation, is there anyway you could post a photo of it? I've seen photos of what you describe and maybe someone may be able to know for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swann_kim Posted February 8, 2008 Author Share Posted February 8, 2008 Arggg... :( I wish I could take picture of the inside of the viewfinder. Some others also suggested that it would be the balsam separation. Hmm.. .. There is no final evidence, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randy_lewis1 Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 If it looks like it is behind the eyepiece it could be just that. The eyepiece screws out so you could remove it and clean the eyepiece and glass that is between the eyepiece and inner workings. It may solve your problem. No guarantee's but If you like the camera except for that, it's worth a shot. I found that one of my M's was like that and it was about a 10 minute fix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuart_richardson Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 If it looks like a tannish, square frame around the edges of the viewfinder, I believe that is the balsam separation...I have it on my M3. In practice, it makes the VF a bit duller, but mine is still usable. I am not sure how much it costs to repair, but it's probably not cheap because it involves removing the top plate, doing a CLA on the viewfinder and presumably recementing the glass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lata Posted February 15, 2008 Share Posted February 15, 2008 http://www.angelfire.com/biz/Leica/page10.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now