alan_green4 Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 I recently advised someone to consider getting the (very pricey, and not that versatile) 135 f2 L. I thought it might be a good idea to post a couple images taken with the 135. Here's a couple shots I took in the rain yesterday (with the 40D). http://www.photo.net/photo/6881962&size=lg http://www.photo.net/photo/6881963&size=lg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morthcam Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 Not that versatile, unless you need f2.0....<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrew_viny Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 I don't own that lens but I've used it on several occasions and it is about as sharp and contrasty as any lens can possibly be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahockley Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 Not sure by what you mean when you say it's not very versatile. It is consistently rated as one of the sharpest lenses that Canon makes, and dropping down to f/2 is great. I've had one for about a year and I love it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alan_green4 Posted January 27, 2008 Author Share Posted January 27, 2008 aaron by 'not that versatile' i mean it's a focal length that's not that popular on either 1.6 or ff bodies -- and it's a fixed lens. the 70-200s get a lot more traction in the marketplace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bret_almazan_cezar Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 What will you use it for? Awesome lens for indoor sports and stage photography where you need the large aperture to speed up shutter speeds to freeze action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bieg Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 It is worth every penny. It also can be used with the TCs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robin_sibson1 Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 "not that popular on either 1.6 or ff bodies" What? 135mm was a standard focal length on 35mm film bodies time out of mind, and was always regarded as the preferred focal length for head-and-shoulders portraiture. Actually the 135/2 is remarkably versatile for a prime lens. It works well enough on the Extender 1.4x that you don't also need the 200/2.8. And it makes a remarkably good large-butterfly lens on an EF25 tube, even permitting use of the macro flashes using the Macrolite Adapter 72C. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdigi Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 How does the one with soft focus compare? I know its much cheaper. I believe its the 135 2.8 softfocus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lou korell Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 I think so. I use mine. Lou Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alan_myers Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 I suppose it depends upon how you define "versatile". If it means "I never have to change my SLR's lens" to you, then no perhaps it's not "versatile". In some sense, almost every prime lens might be called a "specialty" lens. The 135/2 is also a fairly long lens to hand hold without IS on the crop sensor bodies. Certainly doable, but IMHO, IS would be a very nice addition to this lens. I don't have the 135/2, but if I had a FF camera, I would most certainly want it. Especially after hearing/reading all the rave reviews! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommyinca Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 It is a bargain at ~$850 compared to a Nikkor at $950, Minolta at $1200 (for a trick up f2.8) or $1350 for a Sony. A Pentax PKA f1.8 and Zeiss Contax will cost you ~$1500? That is if you can win one and a Lotto (Winning Lotto is easier). An Olympus and Leica version will be priceless as they don't even make one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommyinca Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 Oh Olympus do make a 150mm at F2 (300mm FOV). I supose that is close enough technically, $2000 and weight 3.5 pounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trothwell Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 Extremely high quality. I agree that 135mm can be a perplexing focal length, but if you have a use for it -- portraits, indoor sports, whatever -- then this lens is sure to please. You might even find that 135mmis useful to you in unexpected situations. I've used it for photographing flowers and landscapes, with great results. All depends on what you're after. But the lens itself... outstanding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_j2 Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 I used to shoot Nikon and had the 135/2.8. I hardly used it. Preferring the 85/1.8. Better bokeh at 1.8. The Canon 135/2 is sharp. But, for that price, you would be better off with a 70-200/2.8 with IS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alan_green4 Posted January 27, 2008 Author Share Posted January 27, 2008 i try to shoot everything with the 135. doesn't work too often but when it does...there's nothing that comes close Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
will king Posted January 28, 2008 Share Posted January 28, 2008 The 135mmL f/2 is my favorite lens. It's the sharpest lens I own, even sharper than my 100mm macro. Even wide open, this lens is sharp. The bokeh is creamy smooth. Definitely worth every penny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pgranone Posted January 28, 2008 Share Posted January 28, 2008 The 135 F2L is a fantastic lens. I use if your indoor low light shooting and outdoor shooting. It produces sharp contrasty images with excellent color. F2 is fast, and it is sharp wide open. The focus is fast and accurate. Add 25mm or 25+12mm extension tubes and it is excellent for flowers and other macro shots. An excellent lens for portraits and other photography. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotograf Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 On the above photo- try AI-Servo next time, to avoid image blur. The feet are not in focus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now