Jump to content

Sharp!? We don't need no stinkin' sharp!


johnnycake_.1

Recommended Posts

Peter M and Travis -- thanks.<p>

 

Bob -- I have a sub-specialty in sofa-matching commissions, but first I've gotta see the sofa. And I wasn't the least bit offended by the remark -- took it in the humorous spirit in which it was offered, and I took Vivek's comment the same way. No problem at all.<p>

 

Back to Peter. There most certainly was an element of luck involved. We'd driven up to Baltimore and had time for dinner and wandering around. I snapped <a href=http://www.flickr.com/search/show/?q=baltimore+blur&w=74058404%40N00> several photos that night</a> <i>because the colors appealed</i> to me.<p>

 

But knowing myself, even as I was snapping, I thought that the photos -- if any worked out all-- were probably candidates for b & w conversions. It was a pleasant surprise to see that the very warm colors were quite close to what I'd remembered.<p>

 

And they weren't typical of the street snaps I usually take, which as I think Vivek hints usually do have clearly visible faces. Even <a href=http://www.flickr.com/photos/michael-s/477231372/>one</a> or <a href=http://www.flickr.com/photos/michael-s/634246813/>two</a> from that same night are more like what I often do.<p>

 

Thanks again. I'll tune in later or tomorrow in hopes that Bob will by then have posted a photo of his sofa. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael S.: Bob's remark was directed at my "cream wall" remark, probably misunderstanding what I was saying to mean that the photo is good because I can envision the proper designer room it would fit in.

 

I think it logically follows that without presentation, a photograph is worthless...or at least subverted. Some photos take on a new life when presented BIG. In galleries and museums, much thought is given to the environment in which a work of art is viewed. When I saw your image, I saw one such scenario that would work.

 

You could say that every image should be viewed under a bank of daylight bulbs for consistence of evaluation, picture to picture. But I think that would be an artistically naive opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...