aeh Posted July 29, 2007 Share Posted July 29, 2007 This probably is the wrong forum, but couldn't find one close. Anyway, I have a question about digital files -- "does draging and droping jpeg photo files several times into different folders cause any loss in quality? Thank You for any info I can get, Al Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh_ross1 Posted July 29, 2007 Share Posted July 29, 2007 Maybe digial darkroom would have been a good forum, but either way the answer will still be no. Only opening and resaving loses quality merely moving around on the hard drive does nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdanmitchell Posted July 29, 2007 Share Posted July 29, 2007 You can move or copy without changing the file at all. If you open it, make _any_ changes, and then save you will lose quality with jpg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phule Posted July 29, 2007 Share Posted July 29, 2007 Al, Which of these two changes a sandwich? 1) Moving a sandwich from one plate to another. 2) Eating the sandwich. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckystokes Posted July 29, 2007 Share Posted July 29, 2007 You can open and close it as many times as you want without any change. If you re-save, even without making any changes, there will be some degradation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mendel_leisk Posted July 29, 2007 Share Posted July 29, 2007 With most programs you can do a lossless rotation (say landscape to portrait) of jpeg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marc_rochkind Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Rob... the problem with your analogy ("moving a sandwich") is that both change the sandwich. One less than the other (depressions in the bread, loss of filler, dropped crumbs vs. major removal of portions), but I think when it comes to digital photography we usually talk about pretty subtle changes. The actual answer is still "no," of course. ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aeh Posted July 30, 2007 Author Share Posted July 30, 2007 Thank You all for the speedy replies. That was more or less what I suspected. Just needed more experienced imput, and I thank you, Al Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phule Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 <<Rob... the problem with your analogy>> There's nothing wrong with my analogy, only your understanding of its intended recipient. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now