jacque_staskon Posted April 1, 1999 Share Posted April 1, 1999 I just wanted to say thankyou too all who responded to my query with insight, humor and grace. I have taken your advice and e-mailed Ron Klukas @ Photomark in Phoenix. I am now researching the Deardorff and Kodak camera. Am I correct in assuming that some 8x10's have very limited bellows? That the Deardorff moves both front and back? away from center to balance the camera with a lens attached? Sounds wonderful. Thankyou again for all your responses, I will keep you informed, and I am sure i will ask more questions. I am amazed at the differences between 4x5 and 8x10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellis_vener_photography Posted April 1, 1999 Share Posted April 1, 1999 There is also the old and heavy but folding Calumet C-1 or C3 camera. A beast but usually cheap.</P> Yes some 8x10's have limited bellows but some of the more modern ones do not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean_yates Posted April 1, 1999 Share Posted April 1, 1999 Jacque, <p> The Deardorff focuses & extends on both front & rear. The rear can run all the way forward to the front to focus short lenses without the bed projecting into the shot. The front extends forward only, not backward, like a Wisner. By moving both standards you can size and focus and balance the camera on the tripod. The Kodak Mv does not have this advantage. Ellis is absolutley right about the C1 - 3's very very useable and inexpensive, but also massively heavy and bulky. Lensboards are available for it by the basketful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now