g_t3 Posted March 31, 2007 Share Posted March 31, 2007 Just bought a used Bronica SQ-A with a 120 film back. I took it out for a testphoto shoot past weekend and shot three B&W rolls. I came back home anddeveloped them myself.. to my dismay, all three rolls were exposed. I did allthe reading on the manual prior to going out so I am *almost* sure that I havethe operations correct. I am also sure that films were not exposed during mydevelopment process. So what had gone wrong?? Could it be a bad film back? Oris there any other reasons associated with the camera? I need a few advicesfrom the forum so I can investigate. I did notice that the flim back's outershell seems not to be closed tightly when the back cover is snapped with thefilm insert. Thanks a lot for everyone's help in advanced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobertChura Posted March 31, 2007 Share Posted March 31, 2007 It is normally my intent to expose film when I go out to shoot. Assuming you meant overexposed, it sounds like you found the problem with the outer shell. What do the negs look like? Are there any markings of film edges or are they all light or dark? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_thomas8 Posted March 31, 2007 Share Posted March 31, 2007 Your description is a little vague. Here is a scan from a negative suffering a bad light seal along the end of the back shell opposite the hinge. http://www.pbase.com/dw_thomas/image/67730400.jpg Answers to the following questions that might point to further analysis: Are the negatives really black or are there light-struck but uneven areas with some image visible? Do the numbers and printing on the edge of the film show? Do you have a manual for the camera to check your control settings? (I'm wondering if the shutter is stuck or set in a time exposure mode -- but I'm not sure I understand exactly what you are seeing on your films.) DaveT Relatively recent SQ-A owner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexander_gisoldi Posted March 31, 2007 Share Posted March 31, 2007 If the negatives came out completely clear then I might have a suggestion because I bought a Bronica ETRS and one of my first rolls came out clear. The problem was that I had loaded the film in upside down and nothing came out. Just a thought. Dave showed you pics of light leaks so that should eliminate that problem if you have it. A sticky shutter not opening could also be the problem. Good luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_t3 Posted April 1, 2007 Author Share Posted April 1, 2007 Sorry for the confusion, what I meant was the negatives had come out all clear. I checked the instruction again and I am pretty sure that I had installed the film the right way. Alexander, when you mentioned that you had installed the film upside down, did you mean you had installed the film spooler the wrong way? I have attached an image file that was a cut out from the Bronica SQA manual. The image is not cleared as appeared in the manual so that might have caused my mistake in installing the film. I installed the film in the direction of the RED arrow as shown in the image. Should I be installed the film in the direction of the BLUE arrow instead?? Thanks!<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_thomas8 Posted April 1, 2007 Share Posted April 1, 2007 Yes -- the blue arrow - the printed side of the backing paper should be against the pressure plate. The black side of the paper should be facing out (toward the lens). DaveT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_t3 Posted April 1, 2007 Author Share Posted April 1, 2007 Hi Dave, Thanks a lot for the confirmation. Now I feel such a relief it was only my mistake and wasted three rolls -- there is probably nothing wrong with my gear then. Will go out and shoot ONE and only one more roll this time. :) By the way, the 120 film I bought here (in China) has the paper in black on both side :) . I guess for 0.85 USD per roll, I shouldn't complain too much. Thanks -- I also thought hard about this and made a stupid mistake in thinking that clear developed negatives were exposed... In fact, it should mean that they were NEVER exposed. That is where a mistake in conclusion led to the wrong assumption.... :) Thanks for everyone's help! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_thomas8 Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 "By the way, the 120 film I bought here (in China) has the paper in black on both side " Ooops! I would think though that only one side has printing on it. At any rate, the orientation shown in your diagram should work if you follow the blue arrow route. The SQ-A problems I've seen so far were light leaks in the back seals, a common problem you can fix yourself with a seal kit from "Interslice" (Jon Goodman) on *bay. And one back didn't index the film, just wound a whole roll through without stopping. The seller took it back. Enjoy your SQ-A, I'm having a blast, especially with the square format. DaveT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_t3 Posted April 3, 2007 Author Share Posted April 3, 2007 Will try a roll this weekend and see. Wondering if Jon Goodman has some leatherlette (sp?) replacement for my SQ-A. The bottom leatherlette of the camera body is missing... will look up on ebay Dave, thanks again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now