rick_helmke Posted February 25, 2007 Share Posted February 25, 2007 Here's the problem, partly personal and partly tech related to, you guessed it, medium format. I ran into and old and close friend last night. Hadn't seen her in about a decade. She is still as devestatingly beautiful as she ever was and we clearly hadn't lost any part of being freinds. We literally picked up where we left off and that was a fairly close relationship. The night wore on and we continued to drink with the kiddlings, you know, the college kids that already know everything. Several here probably used to be one, I know I was. Anyway we spent the night as good freinds will and yes, my wife was there too. A tolerant women my Pam but the funny part was how many of the kiddlings commented they hoped they could be in so strong a relationship when they were 'our age'. Impertinent little twits but they were sincere and meant well. Well, to the photographic part of this narrative. I've decided I want to do a series of photographs of my freind Kathy. She's a truly beautiful woman, better now at 40 than when she was 30, still as bright and fun, now with a pair of Master's degrees and a PhD as well. I believe she will make a superb subject for portraits in a variety of settings, all in B&W.I keep thinking Avedon. I'm not yet the master he was but I've got skills. I need the right model and maybe I've got her now. I've got plenty of 35mm but am thinking towards a medium format camera. It has to be simple and reliable. It must be of a design that doesn't get in the way of the work which tells me a Rollei with a 2.8 taking lens, an Autochord or a Mamiya C220 or 330. Maaaayyyybe and Yashcia Mat 124D. Oh, and a Holga. My goal here is silver-base prints in 8x10 or 11x14 and to have a show at one of the local galleries of which we have more than I first realized. I've got a 4x5 view camera and all of the accessories so though maybe a Speed Graphic if a good one can be found. Again, the camera will be a tool and not allowed to interfere with the photographic process. I need a razor sharp lens to produce a good basic image that I can the screw up at will with filters etc. This should be an interesting endeavour. She currently lives several hundred miles away and is moving soon to the Tampa area. Not sure how far away that is from South Alabama but hopefully it can be driven. Maybe one trip a month. This is getting me excited, the first new long term project in some time. Suggestions about any of this?? Thanks. Rick H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicaglow Posted February 25, 2007 Share Posted February 25, 2007 I'm a Hasselblad finatic, but I know what you mean about the convenience of a TLR. For sharpness, I have a strong opinion having used some of the cameras you list, and settling on a Hasselblad to get the job done for about 25 years. For sharpness, I would rule out the Holga and Yashicamat. If you've done large format, I think the only choice that will satisfy you (from your list) is the Rollei. It sounds like cost may be a factor, given your list of cameras. If not, you may want to consider a rangefinder as well, like a Fuji or Mamiya. A Speed or Crown Graphic would be a great choice, but slow and more costly to use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cenelsonfoto Posted February 26, 2007 Share Posted February 26, 2007 Rick - Depending on how far south you are (Dothan? Further south?), yer looking at 7 hours minimum. Your time may vary, but I'd bet around 7 hours with luck, short-to-no stops, etc., and that might be a tad conservative. Might be better, faster, and cheaper to fly outta Montgomery or Birmingham in to Tampa/STPT/CLW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
db1 Posted February 26, 2007 Share Posted February 26, 2007 Hasselblad hands down. The ultimate system with a multitude of lenses and accessories. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
db1 Posted February 26, 2007 Share Posted February 26, 2007 hey rick...you're registered email is kicking back. I want to email you outside of here. How? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilkka Posted February 26, 2007 Share Posted February 26, 2007 I would get an old Hasselblad, something like 500C or CM with either 80mm lens if full body or 150mm if more of portrait type photographs (or both). A true classic camera would fit the project very well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_the_builder1 Posted February 26, 2007 Share Posted February 26, 2007 Rollei 6000 series or Hasselblad or Rolleiflex 2.8GX or RZ67 or Pentax 67II. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_falth Posted February 26, 2007 Share Posted February 26, 2007 Rick, If your wife is coming along, she could help carry the heavier gear, so I wouldn't hesitate with the bigger cameras such as the Mamiya RB/RZ, or the Pentax 67. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bueh Posted February 26, 2007 Share Posted February 26, 2007 I second the Mamiya RZ67. To quote A. Conti from <b><a href="">this thread</a></b>: "<i>The RZ is one hell of a tool. Not a sexy tool, but a very effective one.</i>" <p> If you want to work hand-held, better try an automated 645 <abbr title="single-lens reflex camera">SLR</abbr> like the M645, Pentax 645, etc. Whatever some naysayers post, 645 is a huge step-up from 35mm and has all the beautiful rendering of out-of-focus areas and sharpness of medium format. And the 645 cameras are excellent for easy snapshooting, trying to capture a fleeting moment or expression. <p> By the way, for most seasoned photographers this is not an issue, but if you have no hands-on experience with a <abbr title="waist-level finder">WLF</abbr> this thing <i>will</i> interfere with the photographic process. That's why I guess a 645 <abbr title="single-lens reflex camera">SLR</abbr> could be a more rewarding picture-taker. If I were you, I would definitively take several cameras with me, having them all tested with your wife as the subject. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bueh Posted February 26, 2007 Share Posted February 26, 2007 Sorry, that quote is from <b><a href="http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00FrXw">here</a></b> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marek_fogiel Posted February 26, 2007 Share Posted February 26, 2007 Hasselblad 5xx, Makro Planar 120, Sonnar 180, possibly a prism viewer for studio/slow work. Otherwise Contax 6x4.5 with the Makro Apo Planar 120 if you have to go faster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rick_helmke Posted February 26, 2007 Author Share Posted February 26, 2007 David sorry about that, I need to update my profile. Anyway, try itty.bit@hotmail.com and you should be able to get me. Think I'll try and update now. Rick H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark liddell Posted February 26, 2007 Share Posted February 26, 2007 Since your print sizes are not squre look at 6x7 or 645. RB/RZ67 if you don't mind a tripod. If you want to work hand-held look at 645 slrs, at those sizes 645 should be ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan_spahn Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 Rick, Rick, Rick... This ain't about equipment, it's asking the membership what car is best when driving on the road to Trouble. Any members here with model experience know that inexperienced photographers, particularly married ones, jeopardize their personal lives without explicit ground rules. The wife should be part of the shooting team not the tolerant team. Not only for the assistant you gain, but the comfort of the subject and the peace of mind of the spouse. On this project, never photograph alone and you'll never have to explain anything. I hope this advise is not taken as an attack. Good luck and I hope this project brings you a successful show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rick_helmke Posted February 27, 2007 Author Share Posted February 27, 2007 Not to worry Dan, I'm not looking for permission to have an affair with an old friend. Not wired that way. I am though, looking for opinions on one medium format camera that will let me shoot without getting in the way. Rick H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_h Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 A Pentax 645 will do the job very nicely, for not a whole lot of money. Give one a try. If this lady is more beautiful at 40 than at 30, she will more than likely make a nice subject at 50 ,60 and 70. Photograph her at all of these upcoming ages as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rick_helmke Posted February 28, 2007 Author Share Posted February 28, 2007 I hope I'm able to do that Bob because I think she will be. Got an interesting answer to the camera question this afternoon though. My boss's boss's boss, anyway the guy at the top of the food chain in our region, asked me the other day what he ought to purchase as he is starting from scratch in digital. He's an experienced photographer though he's gotten away from it the last several years. He asked several smart questions and then went with my reccomendations to the tune of $8K or so. Keep in mind I shoot Nikon and he bought Canon. He must be happy with it so far because I still have a job and he brought me a beautiful old Bronica SLR and told me to hang on to it for a few weeks and use it. This is not insignificant because there's a lot of sentimental value to him in this piece, enough so I would not even consider asking to purchase it. What a gorgeous piece of work! It's everything I wanted the Hassleblad to be but it wasn't. This is the answer to what I need to use for this project. It is nice to use it just for its own sake. Kind of like how a Jaguar is designed for the journey and not simply the destination. I mentioned earlier I wanted a camera that didn't get in the way of what I wanted to do. I get the feeling that this old beast is going to give at least partial lie to the idea that it isn't the camera, it's the photographer. Some things add to the results by their design and execution and the fact that they are simply a pleasure to use. We'll see. Rick H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now