Jump to content

M8 at ISO 1250 + Noctilux


paul hart

Recommended Posts

My first results using the M8 at 1250 suggest that it is very useable. These were shot as JPEGs in B+W

mode, with the Noctilux. Very little post-proccessing (in Lightroom) - slight tweaking of levels and

contrast - no sharpening or noise removal at all.<p><center><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/

paul_hart/331282932/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/

129/331282932_14dbf30d22.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="Rachel" /></a><p><a href="http://

www.flickr.com/photos/paul_hart/331724908/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://

farm1.static.flickr.com/136/331724908_39e5817d1e.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="Rachel (2)" /

></a><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/paul_hart/331724318/" title="Photo Sharing"><img

src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/137/331724318_8747cd645e.jpg" width="500" height="333"

alt="Emma in Contemplative Mood" /></a></center>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arthur: the Noctilux is no slouch when it's stopped down. Here's one at (I think) f4, with a

100% crop.<p><center><a href="

title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/

132/332196112_e3901f00c1_o.jpg" width="800" height="533" alt="L1000828.jpg" /></

a><p><a href=" title="Photo

Sharing"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/143/332196152_1fcd3d09f5_o.jpg"

width="800" height="458" alt="L1000828-Edit.jpg" /></a></center>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does this mean:" the Nocti, which does not have a lot of resolution to start with". huh?

thats just wierd. does a nocti even have resolution? ??? its a analog lens not a chip. maybe i dont understand. My m8 - with a nocti has massive noise above 800 asa at long exposures - over 4 seconds. its pretty sad. i havent tried black and white - only color shots. it looks like these pics had alot of available light - try some at twilight, hand held.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judging from the sharpness, it might just be that the M8 and especially improved digital M's in the future, will better exploit sharpness of this lens because the digital sensor is optically flat while film has inherent tiny "hills and valleys" limiting sharpness wide open with the lens' razor thin DOF at f/1. With shots like these, I expect the demand for this lens to go up slightly.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...