howard_roarke Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 The Pause that Refreshes (aka Things Go Better With Coke)<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
howard_roarke Posted August 19, 2006 Author Share Posted August 19, 2006 .<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_levidiotis Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 Take a look at Sections 2251, 2252(a), 2252A and 2256 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt_chamberlain Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=lamer">this about covers it</a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
howard_roarke Posted August 19, 2006 Author Share Posted August 19, 2006 The lady's well over legal age and no offense was intended. If the shots aren't appreciated, I apologize and the thread can be deleted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oceanphysics Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 I think we should give Tom the benefit of the doubt by assuming he was joking, and just isn't very good at it. Being in an academic environment, I'm surrounded by young but legal women every day, and this is one of those, and a nice specimen. Not that it matters, since as far as I know there's no law against photographing someone drinking coca cola, regardless of age. Anyway, I like the shots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
howard_roarke Posted August 19, 2006 Author Share Posted August 19, 2006 Thanks Ocean. I intended to share these as tasteful portraits of an attractive woman (again, well over legal age)... the shots are pure head and shoulders portraits. I've seen shots posted on this forum with more nudity than this, so I thought they would be acceptable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vivek iyer Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 Geez, that was that all about! Howard, ignore the lamers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valery_yakushev1 Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 Thank you Howard, for sharing - very nice shots! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
durr3 Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 Nice shots Howard. Pretty model. How do you like your R-d1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chansonbleu Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 Very nice Howard. Regards Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piotr_panne Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 Yow. What happened to the good old days when somebody would simply call you a scurvy bastard for going digital? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuart_richardson Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 I think these are very good shots. Nice work Howard! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allen Herbert Posted August 19, 2006 Share Posted August 19, 2006 Jeez, I thought this was a W/NW post not a arse licking contest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
howard_roarke Posted August 20, 2006 Author Share Posted August 20, 2006 Okay, I have gone digital. The R-D1 is a nice camera! This isn't the upgraded version, as I have not figured out how to do the firmware upgrade, but I find it gives good results. One needs to be happy with a relatively narrow range of focal lengths though ... Epson/Cosina knew what they were doing when they put in frames for 28, 35 and 50 ... those are exactly the focal lengths this camera works best with. I find the 28m which gives you a 40mm field of view, is just about "what you see is what you get" in the finder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBaker Posted August 20, 2006 Share Posted August 20, 2006 Lovely girl, lovely photographs. She is clearly very happy. What is wrong with everyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
travis1 Posted August 20, 2006 Share Posted August 20, 2006 Howard, you made the rd-1 look good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerry_lehrer Posted August 20, 2006 Share Posted August 20, 2006 Could Mr. Levidiotis's comments be addressed to the use of Coca Cola's copyrighted phrases that Mr. Roark used? Not the fine photographs? I won't even quote those phrases, for fear of a law suite in Atlanta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oceanphysics Posted August 20, 2006 Share Posted August 20, 2006 No, the code sections in question go to the sexual exploitation of minors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now