jeffrey_aiello_photography Posted January 6, 2006 Share Posted January 6, 2006 I already have the 18-55mm kit lens and a 70-300 lens for my D50. I'dlike to get a macro-portrait lens. What's a good macro-portrait lens for my D50? Over lunch I was toldthat the Nikkor 60mm f/2.8D AF Micro is a good lens. Please let me know what you think and any other lenses you'd suggest. I'd like to keep the price of the lens in the $350 range. Thanks, jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaymondC Posted January 6, 2006 Share Posted January 6, 2006 That is the only one. There is a 105 macro isn't there? Thou may be a tad long in times. Not sure about manual lenses but u have a D50. Oh yeah 35-70 f/2.8 is another but its less than a true macro lens. Zoom is push pull design. The 24-85/2.8-4 D is another isn't it? A twist zoom but they are less of a macro lens than the primes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2yellowdogs Posted January 6, 2006 Share Posted January 6, 2006 Your lunch friend was right. If you're looking for one lens to do both portraits and macro, the 60mm (a portrait-perfect 90mm on the D50) would be the one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Ingold Posted January 6, 2006 Share Posted January 6, 2006 If you can settle for about 1:4 in the macro range, the 35-70/2.8 AFD is an extremely fine lens - sharp, with negligible distortion. The used price for KEH excellent grade is about $350. The 60/2.8 macro is also a sharp lens, and can focus down to 1:1, but has much less adaptability for general use. The macro working distance is very short with either lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry_ Posted January 6, 2006 Share Posted January 6, 2006 The 35-70mm f2.8D Nikkor is 'macro' only at the 35mm end. 70mm and 50mm are not in the ball park compared to the AF 60mm Micro-Nikkor or the AF 105mm Micro-Nikkor lenses. Tamron makes a 90mm macro lens that will work OK on your D50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kindrdghst Posted January 7, 2006 Share Posted January 7, 2006 Hey Jeff,Ok... I was recently in your situation, so I did my research. Keep in mind that the Nikon D50/70/70s etc. etc. has a 1.5 crop factor. So a 60mm lens would be equivelant to a 90mm in 35mm terms. The 60mm 2.8 macro lens is a GREAT way to go. But... and yes there is a but... you would be shorting yourself a lens if you end up shooting on film. That irritates me. I'd never buy a special purpose lens unless it worked on film and digital. I opted for the Tamron 90mm 2.8. Great lens. It's equivelant to a 135mm, and can still work as a portrait lens on my n80. On a side note, I'd never buy a dx lens either because I firmly believe that full frame dslr's will be on the market pretty soon. Of course pretty soon is totally debateable, but you get the point. I hope this helps. Pat P.S.Other portrait/macro lenses:Sigma 105 2.8 macro - Great lens, I have one for my Canon setup.Tokina 100 2.8 macro - Recently rated in this months Pop Photo. Some relaly interesting features on this lens too.Nikon 105 2.8 Defocus Control - Great portrait lens, sweet Defocus Control, but no macro.Tamron 90mm 2.8 macro - Good lens. I thikn that about covers it. And honestly, you really can't go wrong with any of these lenses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffrey_aiello_photography Posted January 9, 2006 Author Share Posted January 9, 2006 To Pat and all, Thanks for you honest and straight-forward responses. I don't see myself going to film...but one never knows, does one? I'll let you know which one I end up buying, but I do think I'm leaning towards the Nikkor 60 mm. mentioned above. Thanks! Jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffrey_aiello_photography Posted January 10, 2006 Author Share Posted January 10, 2006 The good thing about one's mind, is it can change! .... also a bad thing. What about the 105mm f/2.8D AF Micro-Nikkor lens? I'm now thinking that it's a much better way to go. thoughts? Thanks, Jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zhuphotography Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 If you do not need Micro/Macro capability, the 50mm 1.8 AF or AFD will be a good portrait lens (will be 75mm on D50/D70). It is cheap ($100 brand new AFD, $60-$80 used for AF/AFD) and real sharp. with 1.8 you have real good DOF control when you needed. Just another thought. Yanping Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramon_v__california_ Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 if you absolutely need macro, then go for the 60mm. if not, go for the cheap but sharp and fast 50mm f/1.8. 105mm might be too long for you on a D50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now