kryn_sporry1 Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 This may be a little daft but I am fairly new with B&W. I realise each film gives a different effect. Can someone tell me (or point me to a source that can tell me) what films are used under what circumstances? E.g. what film for landscape bright daylight blue skies, what with landscape overcast. Portrait, architecture, people/street, etc. Any advice? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_daalder Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 <a href="http://www.photo.net/equipment/film#White"> Search photo.net </a> and you shall find. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juergenf Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 A tripod and some Efke/Adox 25 for landscapes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klix Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 It's not just the film; the developer has quite a bit to do with it too. So, your question should probably be what "film-developer" combination for what situation. The answers are: 1) Search the acrhives. 2) Experiment and experience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lex_jenkins Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 For now I'd suggest sticking with one film, one developer, etc., to minimize the variables. You'll learn a lot more, and more quickly. For my first 30+ years in photography I used Tri-X almost exclusively. The only variable was the developer. While in school and at community darkrooms where D-76 replenishment was the standard occasionally the students assigned to maintain the chemicals killed the developer by "accidentally" pouring in stop bath or fixer. So I switched to HC-110 concentrate, which I kept in a locker or my bag and mixed up myself for one-shot use. I followed this same practice as a photojournalist. Other than some rolls of Plus-X and a couple of experiments with infrared film, I never tried another b&w film until I was almost 40 years old. By that time I was ready to experiment and spent a couple of years trying dozens of combinations of films and developers. Since then I've pruned back a bit to four favorite films and three developers: TMX, Tri-X, TMY and Delta 3200. I could do without TMY if absolutely necessary but it pushes to 1600 really well and doesn't look like Delta 3200 or pushed Tri-X; and, for developers, HC-110, Microphen and Diafine. I photograph architecture, landscapes, still lifes indoors and outdoors, people, you name it. That handful of materials is more than enough. Better photographers than I'll ever be have built careers around one film and one developer. My main variables now are on the printing end. If you start out with something like Tri-X you can expose it from 200 to 1600 (not on the same roll, tho'), with appropriate development for each, and get dramatically different results. Or HP5+. Or TMY. Or Delta 400. Really doesn't matter. A slower film like Plus-X or FP4+ if you don't expect to do any handheld low light photography. Concentrate on the fundamentals of exposure, development, composition and use of light. As you do this you'll attain the skills to enable you to get more benefit from experimenting with different materials later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discpad Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 Lex likes to copy & paste from his scrapbook, because this question gets asked so often! :`) Since you used the word "daft" I'm assuming you're from Our Closest Ally, England... And Ilford http://www.ilfordphoto.com/home.asp makes a fine range of B&W films, which you can easily buy at Jessop's. See http://www.ilfordphoto.com/products/producttype.asp?n=3&t=Consumer+%26+Professional+Films for a list of available films, including a cross-over chart between Ilford and Kodak. Happy Shooting! Dan in New Joisey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lex_jenkins Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 Heck, I wish I was efficient enough to keep copies of my favorite replies on the PC. Nope, most of the time I just regurgitate. Sometimes I don't even quote myself accurately. ;> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klix Posted March 30, 2006 Share Posted March 30, 2006 <i>Heck, I wish I was efficient enough to keep copies of my favorite replies on the PC. Nope, most of the time I just regurgitate - Lex</i> <p><p> Lex - when are you going to stop procrastinating, get off your duff, unpack those boxes and write a photo.net article on your insights on film/dev combo and darkroom techniques? :-) <p><p> KL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lex_jenkins Posted March 30, 2006 Share Posted March 30, 2006 Funny you should mention that. Recently, I think it was when we noticed the movie "Seven" was on TV - again - my cousin, her husband, son and I were discussing which of Dante's seven deadly sins applied to each of us. When my turn came my cousin barked out "Procrastination!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kryn_sporry1 Posted March 30, 2006 Author Share Posted March 30, 2006 heheh, thanks guys... actually, I'm dutch, but yes, I do live in England. Funny how the use of certain words immediately associate people to a certain language/country... Well, makes life interesting I'd say...;O) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now