jon_williams1 Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 My Mini-DV camcorder has failed me too many times. (Eating tapes,overheating, etc., even after it came back from the shop. Don't everbuy a discontinued store display item.) I found out I can send it infor a total refurbishment for less than a new one, but I've got a tripcoming up in a few weeks (not enough time). As an inexpensive solution, I have been considering getting one ofthose pocket-size camcorders that uses flash memory instead of a tape(e.g. Aiptek IS-DV). The high end for these seems to be around $150,at which point you can get one that records in MPEG-4 (sufficient formy projects), uses a lithium-ion battery instead of AA's, records 30frames per second at 640x480 resolution, and also functions as anaudio recorder. I like the idea of having no moving parts to worry about. I'll also be bringing along a Sony DSC-F828 digital camera, but I haveruled out relying on its movie mode for video (with the exception ofnear-darkness conditions), because the Memory Stick Pro that wouldallow 30 frames per second costs more than some camcorders. (Also, Imight want to do stills and video at the same time... tricky, but notimpossible.) Since the 828 is a big, two-handed camera, it would benice if I can stash the other camera in my pocket when I'm not using it. I'll be bringing a laptop and an 80-GB external HD along on this trip,so I figure a couple of 1/2-GB cards and an extra battery are all I'dneed to shoot all the video I want. The trip is to a convention in ahotel, so I can easily get to the laptop (upstairs in a hotel room) totransfer pictures and video off the cards). The lighting conditions I'll be in are typical of the convention spacein a hotel: mostly lit by recessed ceiling lamps retrofitted withcompact fluorescent bulbs. How well do these types of cameras performwith that as the available light? Anyway, having shared all that, I would like to hear from anyone whohas had any experience (good or bad) with solid-state camcorders andwho can comment on their reliability. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peza Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 OFFTOPIC: Sony and their memory sticks - thats why I never point any of my friends to SONY cameras when asking 'what to buy'. Proprietary means bad for user, good for manufacturer, unless there is no "common" eqivalent of simillar parameters.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelChang Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 The 828 takes CF cards too, and can be set it to lower resolution and greater compression in movie mode if you wish (MPEG1, I believe - don't have the manual in front of me). <br><br> Those inexpensive cameras have very slow lenses only good for outdoor sunny days. I'd stay away from them, although admittedly they're rather cute and have some gadget value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbq Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 My opinion is that you get what you pay for. Looking at the size of the lens on those "toys" gives me an idea of the light-gathering capabilities of those things (i.e. not much). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsbc Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 My Sony miniDV has major noise problems in this setting. Have you tried your 828 movie mode in similar lighting conditions? Not good. Do you think any $150 camera would a smaller chip fare better? So the Memory Stick Duo is more a better deal because it is something that you may actually use after the conference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now