franciscodiaz1 Posted August 25, 2005 Share Posted August 25, 2005 I have a new EOS 20D, and my decission now is which one of the many different Canon lenses tu buy for portraits (budget is not the main problem). Can you give your advises before buying?. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bens Posted August 25, 2005 Share Posted August 25, 2005 indoor or outdoor? group or individual? indoor individual -- 50/1.4 or 85/1.8 depending on how much space you have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henrik.ploug Posted August 25, 2005 Share Posted August 25, 2005 When you say "portrait", I asume you mean head-and-shoulder-shots. For that you will need a fast prime in the range of 50mm to 135mm. I have the Canon 50mm f1,4 (520$) which I like a lot. But you could also get the 50mm f1,8 (140$), 85mm f1,8(570$), 100mm f2,0 (780$) or 135mm f2,0 L (1650$). 135mm will give you a more blurry background than 50mm, but it will also make the face look a little more flat. You can see pictures taken with the different lenses here (scroll down to the bottom and click on one of the lenses): http://www.pbase.com/cameras/canon And you can find reviews here: http://www.photographyreview.com/cat/lenses/35mm-primes/PLS_3111crx.aspx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbq Posted August 25, 2005 Share Posted August 25, 2005 For head or head-and-shoulder portraits, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, or even 85/1.2 if you can afford. I own the 50/1.4 and the 85/1.8 on a 10D. They're both very sharp from about f/2.4. The 85 feels more substantial and feels like it focuses faster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KenPapai Posted August 25, 2005 Share Posted August 25, 2005 For outdoors and you want the most versatility and sacrifice no quality then the two f/2.8L zooms make *excellent* (money making) portrait lenses on your 20D -- the 24-70 and the 70-200. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_crist Posted August 25, 2005 Share Posted August 25, 2005 It depends on the type of portrait (head & shoulders, 3/4, and full length) and the number of people in it. I use the Canon 50mm 1.4 and the 24-70 2.8L lenses. These 2 lenses have covered every possibility for me. The 50mm is MUCH cheaper and lighter than the 24-70. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt_sallis Posted August 26, 2005 Share Posted August 26, 2005 If budget is not a problem then the 85mm f1.2 is your lens. I use the Zeiss 50 year Anniversary 85mm f1.2 and it produces beautiful photos. I understand the Canon version comes fairly close optically, but obviously has autofocus as well (and is cheaper and easier to find). The gorgeous visual effect that such limited depth of field produces cannot be replicated with anything but a huge aperture lens. It's bokeh heaven, and people will swoon at your photos ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lester_wareham Posted August 26, 2005 Share Posted August 26, 2005 I have the 50mm f1.4 which I assumed would be a good portraite lens. However, I find this does not blur the background as well as an 85mm f1.8 on full frame so allow clearence from the background. Alternatively the 85mm f1.8 would be a good choice. The 100mm f2.8 Macro works well for tight head shots and for small kids. For both these lenses you will need a lot of working room with adults. All these are very sharp lenses so selective mask sharpening in post processing is to be recommended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanp Posted August 26, 2005 Share Posted August 26, 2005 Francisco I know that you have said budget is not a main problem, but despite this I would not overlook the 'bargain' canon 50mm 1.8 for portrait work on a 1.6x crop digital SLR. You may find this lens perfectly suitable for your needs. Just a thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franciscodiaz1 Posted August 26, 2005 Author Share Posted August 26, 2005 Thanks you all for your opinions and advise. I see an agreement on some lenses that I will considere. Thanks very much. Paco. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yakim_peled1 Posted August 26, 2005 Share Posted August 26, 2005 <p> <a href="http://photonotes.org/articles/beginner-faq/lenses.html#portrait">What is a portrait lens?</a> <b></b> </p> <p>Happy shooting, <br> Yakim.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flowingcolor Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 All the lenses that were mentioned above are great lenses but are better suited for full frame of film cameras do the 50mm will be something like an 80mm..... thats telephoto already. I own a EF35mm F2 which is great because I can be pretty close to the subject if you had a 50mm you will have to back-up and if you're indoors that might not be an option. Peace! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spearhead Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 I use the 17-40 for portraits, mostly somewhere in the middle. There is no such thing as a "portrait lens," lenses are distinguished by physical characteristics such as focal length, aperture, and other things like perspective control and fisheye. Any lens can be a "portrait lens," and thinking about it that way will probably make your portraits far more easy. If you want to do classical headshots, for example, if you are doing z-cards for models or actors, then there are specific focal lengths that are probably useful. Otherwise, use anything and think about the things that matter in portraits, like the relationship between the subject and the background and the subject and the photographer. Music and Portraits Blog: Life in Portugal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now