slawek_jacek Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 Could someone recommend a few good, but not VERY expensive (read: used) "standard" AF zoom lenses for my new ZX-5n? It came with a Tamron AF28-80, which does not seem to be a best lens according to some reviews. I also have Pentax-M SMC 50/1.4, Sicor-XL 28mm and manual Zeiss 70-210 (on the old faithful ME Super). Those I'll probably stick with. Sooner or later I will be also shopping for a AF flash. Any sugestions there? Thanks,Slawomir Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unca mikey Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 My standard walkaround lens is the FA 28-105 f3.2/4.5 -- small and light, a great match for the ZX-5n, IMO. (I use it on a *ist 35mm, similar size.) I don't know your definition of expensive, but it's about $200 brand new, and well worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve graham Posted April 13, 2006 Share Posted April 13, 2006 Another good walkabout lens to consider is the Sigma 24-135mm F2.8-4.5. The 24mm wide end is very useful and the lens can be had new on Ebay pretty cheap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stemked Posted April 13, 2006 Share Posted April 13, 2006 I'd second Unca's recommendation. The 28-105 f3.2-4.5 is a great lens, I used one for 80% of my photography while traveling through China. It is lightweight and optically a wonderful lens. Be careful though there are two other Pentax lenses with the same range (28-105) both f4-5.6 I believe. The first f4-5.6 lens (58mm filter)is FANTASTIC but it weighs a ton, the second (62mm filter)is a rebagged Tamron and only so-so it seems. As to the flash it really depends on your needs. For a little fill-in the flash on the camera is pretty good. To get an idea what Pentax ofers in the way of lenses and flash check out http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/index.html I personally use two 200T for macro work, AF280T for a lot of other photography and offacionally an AF500ATZ or AF400T again depending on my needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
george_d._gianni Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 The latest 28-105 incarnation Douglas and Unca mentioned is a very good lens, but not widely available. Consider the f4/28-70mm zoom, which was the standard kit lens for your MZ-5N. It is one of the best consumer zoom lenses built by Pentax. I don't know the Pentax line of flashes. I have been using Metz units for decades and like them a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stemked Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 I hate to disagree, but the 28-70mm f4 has been the most trouble of any Pentax lens I have ever owned. It has always had serious veginetting problems with polarizers and I got back frankly unuseable photos from a trip to Europe because I purchased and used the stupid overprised dedicated hood (rubber) for this lens. After moving to a new home, the lens had been in a box for about 4 months, I noticed a terrible light film in the elements that made it totally unuseable. At first I thought it was mold, but it turned out that it is not an uncommon problem with this lens. I personally would recommend an old cheap variable 35-80mm f?-5.6 over the 28-70 f4 anyday (not that I would really recommend a 35-80!). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franka t.l. Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 I have quite different experience with the FA 28-70/4.0, have no problem with it other than its sometime floppy manual focusing. I have had some great picture taken with this lens and it seems to work well for me. If manual focus is OK, I would recommend the SMC-A 35-70/4.0, a very solid performer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grillot Posted April 18, 2006 Share Posted April 18, 2006 SIGMA.. pick a focal length.. I have a ZX-5N (recently added the *istDS) .. aside from the Pentax 28-80 which came with the camera - I added a Sigma 105 for portraits and a 24mm for outdoors.. both will work it you go to digital although the focal length (actually, field of view) falls victim to the lens multiplier of 1.5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now