shadowcatcher Posted April 6, 2006 Share Posted April 6, 2006 Dear All, I have just bought a canon 5D and consequently sold my beloved 10- 22mm EF-s lens (which was great). I just loved the ultra wide-angle shots I got at 10mm on my canon 20d. I now need to replace it and have been told I should think about one of these three lenses. Canon EF 17-40mm F4 L LENS Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 EX DG ASPHERICAL All are similar prices and so suggestions would be most appreciated. With very best wishes, Kev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pto189 Posted April 6, 2006 Share Posted April 6, 2006 Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM cannot be used with a full frame DSLR. It has been designed for smaller 1.6x sensor. Canon EF 17-40mm F/4L and Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 EX DG ASPHERICAL. However, the Sigma 12-24 f/4.5-5.6 EX DG has no front thread for filters. I would suggest the Canon 17-40 f/4L or better yet the Canon 16-35 f/2.8L. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KenPapai Posted April 6, 2006 Share Posted April 6, 2006 I wonder who told you that Dr. K? In any case get a top notch wide zoom lens for your 5D and the only top wide angle choice to fit that bill is the 16-35 2.8L. It's a lens you will never experience buyer's remorse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_ziegler2 Posted April 6, 2006 Share Posted April 6, 2006 I am very satisfied with my 16-35 f/2.8 which I use with my 5D. I just bought a Fisheye 15mm f/2.8 and find it to be a really fun lens with the 5D. I plan to use it mostly for shots of European piazzas, as I�m doing a trip to Italy next month. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fourfa Posted April 6, 2006 Share Posted April 6, 2006 For the equivalent field of view as your 10-22, keep it to the 16mm-40mm range. The Sigma 12-24 is an extraordinary lens on full frame - equivalent to 7.5mm-15mm on your 20D. That is literally as wide as it gets at the present time, without going to fisheye, and has its own creative challenges. Truth be told I haven't yet seen a lot of pictures at 12mm full-frame that are more than novelties, whereas a 17-40 or 16-35 is a more general purpose tool. You can add the Tamron 17-35 to your list to look at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marknagel Posted April 6, 2006 Share Posted April 6, 2006 I have the 16-35L and the 10-22EF-s. I am very pleased with my 16-35. Its the same Focal range as the 10-22 on a FF camera and its faster and sharper. Since you are a Doctor, I'll just assume its in your price range:) Comparisons between the 16-35L and 10-22EFs http://www.nagelhome.com/10-22%20vs%2016-35%2022mm.jpg http://www.nagelhome.com/10-22%20vs%2016-35%2016mm.jpg Mark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now