Jump to content

Walz Envoy 35 Rangefinder


Recommended Posts

Hello All,

 

I recently acquired a Walz Envoy 35 Rangefinder at a camera swap. It seems to be in good working

order. I'm in the process of shooting a roll of Tri-X with it. Serial # is 90159. Lens is a Nitto Kogaku - S

Kominar 1:1.9 F=4.8cm, seven element. This camera feels very solid & well made. I've shot with Konica

sII, Konica auto SII & Kiev rangefinders. My other cameras are Nikon mf & Rollei Twin lens. My questions

are: Does any know the history or background of this model, year of manufacture? What should I expect

from this lens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Generally, anyone who makes a 1.9 lens for the competitive Japanese market probably isn't producing junk. It may or may not measure up to the competition, but chances are it is capable of good work. I would be more worried about the mechanical aspects of any cameras of that era. It is a nice looker!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the cheap knock-off Sears tower (Mamiya) 18B-- basically the same camera with a 2.0 48mm Kominar.A really nice camera whuich I pais &8.00 on Ebay. I've have seen 3 or 4 Waltz Envoys go on Ebay in the $65-70 range.There is very little information on the net regarding Waltz or the Envoy.

http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00BpIb&tag=

 

Even the Knock-off Tower/Mamiya is a solid camera,great lens, pre crappy foam light seals light seals,a few plastic part replacements.

The Envoy is the real thing,and fairly rare(going bu ebay)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Walz Envoy is a fine camera if you can find one that works. The one I had was afflicted with film transport problems. I have encountered several others but all had problems of one type of another. Good luck with it. Post some photos when you get them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

>> I've shot with Konica sII

 

I got a Konica SII in 1961, carried home by my uncle from Japan. My first serious camera. Used it well until the early 70's when the shutter went. I'm agonizing over whether I should have the camera refurbished (Greg Weber). Sentimental value is becoming less important to me, but I remember that this camera took some pretty good photos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...