rgans Posted February 17, 2002 Share Posted February 17, 2002 Whoever makes the paper, it's great paper. Just not all that available. I have tried contacting Bergger in France with some questions (about other issues), at info@bergger.fr, but have never received a response from them. I would like to hear something definitive from both Bergger (France) and Forte about this. The thing is, on Bergger's web site, their English blurb does not actually claim they manufacture anything. The French version is much more specific: <p> "Nous continuons la tradition de fabrication de produits de qualité, spécialement des papiers photographiques noir et blanc dont la gamme s'est considérablement enrichie, ainsi que des produits adaptés aux procédés alternatifs. <p> Nous pensons que nos produits de haute qualité vous permettront d'exprimer, de manière originale, votre créativité et votre talent." <p> Of course, a close reading of the French version also indicates they do not actually claim they manufacture, but it is very suggestive. <p> I'm going to test the papers myself (Bromofort vs Prestige). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_horowy Posted February 17, 2002 Share Posted February 17, 2002 Mr.Michler, <p> I have not run out of arguments, but I failed to see who elected you judge and me public defendant. <p> I have clearly stated here and all over the interent that Bergger uses manufacturing facilities all over Europe. <p> Ask your Sear Kenmore dealer where the factory is. Ask Luminos where the factory is. Ask Zone VI where the factory is. Ask Epson where the factory is. Get my point? <p> What you accusing me of is simply fraud. This insults me and my organization. <p> I appologize to Ed and all who read this thread, but enough is enough. <p> If you don't like Bergger Products, don't use them. <p> John HorowyBergger Products, Inc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfred_michler1 Posted February 17, 2002 Share Posted February 17, 2002 Dear Mr. Horrowy, please reread my comments carefully. I have never accused you of fraud nor have I implied this. I want to make this point very clear. As to the French text on the Bergger site: I guess General Motors, Ford, VW, Honda, Mitsubishi, Renault and many other car makers see their production of cars in the tradition of Carl Benz! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volker_schier1 Posted February 18, 2002 Share Posted February 18, 2002 John, I find your comparisons very interesting indeed, but also puzzling. Do you want to tell us that you compare the way Bergger does business to Sears, Luminos etc.? Off course everyone knows that Sears for example does not produce any of the goods they sell, they have them rebadged by the manufacturers. I own a Sears washmashine which is also sold as Frigidaire and GE and is produced by Frigidaire (see for example Consumer Reports). Obviously neither of these three washmashines is better or worse, they are identical, only the price differs. If this is what you are trying to tell us by using these comparisons than you actually do admit that Bergger is rebadging the products they sell. I would not know how else to interpret this comment of yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_horowy Posted February 18, 2002 Share Posted February 18, 2002 Mr.Schier, <p> We manufacture to our specifications. We use facilities all over Europe that have the expertise in the products we're producing. Some do a better job for film, some for paper. We contract the machinery and time and mix our own emulsions, period. <p> We do Not rebadge anyones products. <p> I don't know what else I can't tell you. <p> John HorowyBergger Products, Inc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agnes_frey Posted February 18, 2002 Share Posted February 18, 2002 As someone who has worked in the photo industry I can tell you that this is not the way it workes. The "mixing" of emulsion -- as you call it -- is a process which is very specific for one setup. It is hardly possible to simply take one "ipe" and and have it made by different manufacuters, despite the fact that I have not heard of any manufacturer who whould do this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_horowy Posted February 18, 2002 Share Posted February 18, 2002 So what's your point? <p> That you used to work in the photo industry, or that you haven't heard of any manufacturer that does this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volker_schier1 Posted February 18, 2002 Share Posted February 18, 2002 John, I think we have reached a point were it gets really ridiculous. I think everyone understands quite well what Agnes is trying to tell us -- obviously without the exception of you: The analogue would be that Sears sends their people over to Frigidaire (to stick to your comparison as an example) to use their machines to build Sears washingmashines! I think everyone knows that this is not how it is done! I guess you really can't argue that Bergger people are going to Vacs in Hungary to mix up the emulsion to be coated. Despite that Forte would not allow this, it does not explain that the products are the same. The Bergger people then would have to mix up Forte emulsion to make this miracle happen. Agnes has already pointed out that the curves of Bergger film and Forte film are identical. I think this is more than proof. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_horowy Posted February 18, 2002 Share Posted February 18, 2002 Mr. Schier, <p> It's obvious that I can't give you an answer that you will be happy with, So I'm not sure I even owe you one at this point. <p> I do not appreciate being accused of being a lier! <p> Bergger has 1000's of satisfied customers, all appreciate what this little company brings to the pallete of papers in this country. <p> Now, please go find someone else to pick on, and possibly get a little psychiatric help while you're at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volker_schier1 Posted February 18, 2002 Share Posted February 18, 2002 Dear readers of this listserv, I think the last statement by John Horrowy speaks for itself. I am convinced that a manager of a serious photographic company would never write comments like this. Just for the record: I did not accuse you of lying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_parmet1 Posted February 18, 2002 Share Posted February 18, 2002 Volker, <p> Than what exactly are you accusing John of? <p> For the record, I could care less if Bergger papers and film were manufactured by elves in a tree. I've used both and I like the results. <p> You on the other hand seem to have some chip on your shoulder. You badger John and the other members of this board on and off list every time Bergger products are discussed or even mentioned in other contexts. <p> Do you have something on YOUR mind you'd like to share with the class? Is there something YOU know that we don't? I didn't think so. <p> And for the record again, please don't email me off list again. I could do without the spam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corine_schleif Posted February 18, 2002 Share Posted February 18, 2002 Just a moment Dave: We are all on this list to discuss matters of photography. Volker's arguments are very good and he has the same right as all of us have to contribute to this list. In fact he addresses issues that many of us are interested in. We do not live in Enronland, were the industry controls publicity. Our country is built on free speech. I also think that the answers Mr. Horowy gives are more than thin. In addition to that I think that there is no excuse for insulting Volker. Since you defend Bergger that much: Are there any connections between you and Bergger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_jones7 Posted February 18, 2002 Author Share Posted February 18, 2002 Hi, <p> Thanks for every ones replies to my question. <p> I have one more, Is Fomapan T200 the same as Fortepan 200? <p> Thanks, Paul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_parmet1 Posted February 18, 2002 Share Posted February 18, 2002 Yes Corine, My whole house was built with bribes from John and I named my first born son Bergger. <p> In fact, I'm really just a Berggerbot. Even as we speak I'm tossing out all the Oriental Seagull, Tri-X, Verichrome Pan and Ilford MG IV out of my darkroom and I'm planning on doing the whole thing over with Bergger advertisments. <p> Now really, does invoking Enron really bring anything intelligent to this conversation or do you just want to delve into further conspiracy theories? <p> Cause I've got a ton of them but I don't think any of them are appropriate to this forum, despite what other folks may think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_parmet1 Posted February 18, 2002 Share Posted February 18, 2002 And another thing.... <p> Considering that Bergger is one of only two companies I'm aware of that have ever responded to a question or comment on these boards concerning their products, I think John deserves far better treatment than the roughing up he received here. <p> The universe of black and white film and chemical suppliers is shrinking daily. I think the efforts shown by the representative of Bergger as well as the other company in question on these boards speak volumes about their commitment to the black and white photography community. <p> And I think it's pretty sad that some will take my words to mean I'm on the take. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfred_michler Posted February 18, 2002 Share Posted February 18, 2002 Dave, calm down! Volker has every right to say what they want to say, also you have this right and Bergger, as long as they do not insult anyone. So far I have only seen the Bergger representative insult someone here and this should not be tolerated. The highest penalty in soccer is the Red car. I will definitly show him mine, since I think his last comment disqualifies him as someone I want to do business with. I guess this discussion is very necessary, since in this world much has to do with money, also photography. I definitly want to buy the best products for the least money. That the B&W market is getting smaller is really no argument, as long as the manufacutring companies stay in business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volker_schier1 Posted February 18, 2002 Share Posted February 18, 2002 Dear Paul, to you question: No, they are not the same and very different in characteristics. Fomapan T200 is my favourite film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agnes_frey Posted February 18, 2002 Share Posted February 18, 2002 Dear Mr. Parmet, dear Mr. Horowy, I did not want to send any further comments to this specific question, but now I feel I have to. Mr. Horowy, you write a lot about your company being insulted, which I do not see, but I think there is absolutely no reason for ad hominem attacks. Mr. Parmet, please stay reasonable. Your answer to Ms. Schleif is not productive at all. This is a listserv for discussion and all relevant topics should be addressed. I feel this is a relevant topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russell_brooks Posted February 19, 2002 Share Posted February 19, 2002 I am not convinced that the Classic Art Polywarmton is the same as Forte PWT Plus. I have both and printed on both and get different results. It could be age, it could also be that the wrong thing got into the Classic batch...<br>As far the the debate goes I think it's time to stop the Bregger "bashing". If they repackage Forte or any other brand it doesnt really matter. Many companies in many industries do this and it's legal and even ethical. It's up to us to decide if the "added value" of the new label is worth something to us. The best example of this was a marshmellow factory in Las Vegas. It seems all the marshmellows in the US come off the same assembly line. If you want to pay more for the stay-puff brand instead of the local generic brand then so be it. And my comment to the Bregger representative is to just stay above the fight and to stop commenting on this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georges_giralt Posted February 19, 2002 Share Posted February 19, 2002 Hello ! I've seen a lot of "noise" regarding Bergger products. I've read numerous interviews of the CEO of Bergger in France. He admited the do not produce themselve the papers they sell, but that those paper are custom made for them in west europe, india, and maybe other places. He told that they ask for a recipe because he knew this recipe is working because it was a Guilleminot one. And he stated that today, to make a FB paper you must be doing RC B&W or color in order to make the money the FB will cost you. But if I've understood him well, none of his contractor will have the right to use the recipe for its own products. So you may come close, but not the same. I was told that some paper where made in the Czech Foma factory and that they switched elsewhere due to quality concern ? (the FOMA group does not have FB variable papers on their listings) So you may have some papers from Forte, from Foma, from Sterling, and others... BTW someone told me that TETENAL papers are not made by TETENAL..... Who knows ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rgans Posted February 19, 2002 Share Posted February 19, 2002 If Bergger farms out production to other makersthat would explain some of the vagueness on their web site. The quality of the product, so far in my limited experience, has been wonderful. Quality control issues aside, it's a great idea because it lowers the capital outlay and thereby the risk, allowing them more flexibility over the long haul, with varying market conditions. However, the notion that Forte=Bergger does persist, has been around for a few years, and apparently is the belief among some retailers in Europe. If Forte != Bergger, then that would also explain some of John's exasperation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russell_brooks Posted February 20, 2002 Share Posted February 20, 2002 It seems that the tetenal paper's are actually from AGFA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fritz_reckow Posted February 21, 2002 Share Posted February 21, 2002 Russell, I compared Bergger and Forte warmtone papers and had theimpression that they were identical. I cannot detect any difference inpaper base or emulsion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ed b. Posted February 22, 2002 Share Posted February 22, 2002 I find it a bit unusual that every time Dr. Schier posts on the same day as Agnes Frey and Alfred Michler they all have the same IP address, traceable to Arizona State University. Dr. Corine Schleif is a real person--a scholar at Arizona State, who collaborates with Dr. Schier--but I am unable to verify that these other folks are real. It is also a bit unusual that these folks never seem to make posts regarding any other subject. One might conclude that Dr. Schier has some sort of vendetta against Bergger. That doesn't prove that he is incorrect in regard to the origin of Bergger products, but it does cast doubt on his motives. Why does he take every opportunity to denigrate Bergger? Surely it is more than just a desire to keep us poor fools from getting ripped off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_randall Posted February 22, 2002 Share Posted February 22, 2002 Volker Schier has made some very disparaging remarks concerning Bergger Products and John Horowy. They seem to be opinion stated as fact. I doubt that anyone on this list has the credentials necessary to back up the contrary claims that have been made regarding the aforementioned. I am quite sure that with the exception of John Horowy, no one, including Volker Schier, has ever been in a facility that produces either Forte or Bergger materials. I suggest that Volker Schier come forward with his or her phone number and mailing address so that Mr. Horowy may at least have an avenue open for an appropriate response. During the discovery portion of a civil court action Volker Schier could demand to see Bergger's manufacturing operation as well as the documentation supporting it's formulas. This might have a calming effect on Volker Schier's ire. Also during discovery, Mr. Horowy would be able to see the support materials that lead Volker Schier to his or her incredible and damaging statements. Let a jury decide who is telling the truth. I firmly believe Bergger and John Horowy would prevail in court. Hiding behind the email address of a large university allows anyone to say anything without fear of sanction. Stepping forward in full disclosure requires a bit more truth and character than Volker Schier may possess. Shame on anyone that would spread such nonsense, and shame on anyone that would listen to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now