Minoxit Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 my first zorki 1c came with an Industar 50,and i was kinda dissapointed when i tested teh camera;i mean the body was excellent (shutter and stuff very OK)...The lens was scratched and hazy... however,i decided to ruin a roll just to see HOW c*appy could the results be.And here are a few results...definitely no summitar:- ))...but i kinda come to love the eerie feeling of this haziness.I now have a brand "old new" Industar 50 and the results are as expected:sharp and neat...but somehow my first lens gave an air of "je ne sais quoi"to my pics...oh well :-)) i kept it and someday when i get bored of these sharp images,i will take the little russian to a walk:-) anyone sharing? regards<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minoxit Posted May 18, 2005 Author Share Posted May 18, 2005 and here you have the "old new" industar 50,no scratches it does make a world of a difference,doesnt it?<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minoxit Posted May 18, 2005 Author Share Posted May 18, 2005 one thing i noticed,perhaps someone could explain it to me:why and how the DOF is affected by the sharpness(or lack of it thereof)of the lens used in one given camera(i mean the same,if one is making an experiment)? i mean i guess why,but i cannot figure how... two examples below<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minoxit Posted May 18, 2005 Author Share Posted May 18, 2005 and the satisfactory DOF with the new lens<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mskovacs Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 I think you are imagining DoF issues. There are simply too many other factors: different subject, different distance, hand-holding, etc. <p>I don't know how different the I-50 is, but Matt Denton has some step by step I-26 and I-61 service instructions <a href="http://homepage.mac.com/mattdenton/photo/cameras/industar_relubing/">HERE.</a> <p>I don't have a Leica thread mount Soviet camera so I've never worked on one, though on many Jupiter lenses in Kiev mount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larry h-l Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 The 3 main items determining DOF are: focal length, aperture setting, subject to camera distance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorn ake Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 Haziness decreases sharpness, and so your eye reads that haziness as a decrease in the depth of field. Same thing happens when you take a fuzzy scan and apply unsharp masking to the image - suddenly the depth of field increases. The application of contrast, which often heightens the eye's ability to resolve edges of things, also will increase the perception of depth of field. A fuzzy figure standing in front of a fuzzy gray field looks like someone in (as in not separate from) a fog. A white figure, sharply cut out, standing in front of a flat black field, looks like someone standing before a void. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minoxit Posted May 18, 2005 Author Share Posted May 18, 2005 mike i guess my question was a bit unclear...i was asking if,how and why the sharpness of a lens determines the DOF...i know what that is(dof) i know that the field is determined by such factors as you have kindly reminded me,but i was asking if among these factors,is one related to sharpness. anyway,thank you all for replying best regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now