david_henderson Posted September 14, 2006 Share Posted September 14, 2006 I have most of my LightJet prints made by WCI on Crystal Archive gloss more than satisfactorily. Once in a while I need prints fast and I need to use a UK lab that historically have been at least adequate with the same printer/paper combination. Today I looked at some proofs that were very dull, kind of heavy, and totally lacked sparkle. The printer muttered that they were having to use Endura not Crystal Archive. Question is whether, if properly profiled, this should be making a lot of difference. Does Endura tend to give dull results or is it the way this lab is using it? To the best of my knowledge all their several years of LightJet use has been on Crystal Archive, so neither I nor I suspect they have much of an idea what Endura is capable of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inspiration point studio Posted September 14, 2006 Share Posted September 14, 2006 adoramapix offers edura prints and custom color profiles, although they're in the US. I just ordered about 100 5x7 prints from them and I won't call the end products dull. There were very close to what I saw on my monitor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert himmelright Posted September 15, 2006 Share Posted September 15, 2006 there are several flavors of endura. Ultra allegedly has the highest contrast and therefore percieved saturation, Supra is sort of middle grade, and Portra is the flattest. I'm willing to bet portra endura looks flatter than FCA, and that Supra would probably match it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vinny_walsh Posted September 15, 2006 Share Posted September 15, 2006 I've had several lightjets made on it using a&i's profiles and have been disapointed every time. The color just isn't there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boris_krivoruk3 Posted September 15, 2006 Share Posted September 15, 2006 I still print using conventional darkroom. Endura does not give dull results compared to Crystal Archive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r.t. dowling Posted September 15, 2006 Share Posted September 15, 2006 It does depend on which flavor of Endura it is (Portra, Supra, or Ultra)... but I do recall Scott Eaton saying that none of them had as much raw saturation as Crystal Archive. It stands to reason, however, that if this lab just recently switched to Endura from CA, they may not be that familiar with it and perhaps haven't yet figured out how to get the best results from it. I've had a lot of shots printed on Royal, which would seem to be roughly comparable to Endura Supra, and I like it a lot. Metallic is really nice as well, especially if you want high gloss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl_borowski Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 I know a lot of photographers on this board are infatuated with "pop" and high-contrast products. Kodak EDGE and Crystal Archive may be high-contrast, but they also block up the most tending to their higher contrast. THe finest tonalities and gradations can be achieved with Portra. I'm printing a wedding and I'm using EDGE to proof and Portra to print (all analog optical). I certainly prefer Portra because it gives me a lot more shadow and highlight information than a corresponding print from EDGE. I can scan matched samples comparing the two if anyone is interested. It's EDGE 8, not EDGE Generations, so it's an older, and slightly expired, so it's results are going to be different than EDGE Gen, but it'll give you an idea. I personally think Fuji's Crystal Archive is too heavy on the blues and greens. I do have some PIII in 16x20 that I'm testing, and that seems better though. I know this is all different with digital, as you have very flat looking files that tend to benefit from a high-con paper. Just FYI, Kodak now also makes a special paper developer designed to kind of force maximum blacks out of prints made from digital files, which tend to clip at dark gray. It may benefit to find a lab that has switched to this new RA developer. In any case, I wouldn't use either EDGE or Crystal archive for truly archival copies. CA is only rated at 40 years, and EDGE at 18 (assuming daily exposure to room light) They don't make good display copies. I'd recommend PIII for the best color longevity. Regards, ~Karl Borowski Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fast_primes Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 Karl--what is PIII? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl_borowski Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 Sorry, Fuji P III is Fuji's professional low-contrast offering in the RA-4 market. ~Karl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott_eaton Posted September 19, 2006 Share Posted September 19, 2006 <I>Kodak EDGE and Crystal Archive may be high-contrast, but they also block up the most tending to their higher contrast</i><P>Total BS. Somebody obviously is taking their lack of darkroom experience and applying it to their even greater lacking of emulsion technology. Next you'll be telling us Ink-Jet prints only last 5 years. <P>First, Kodak Edge is a nasty, high contrast, amatuer mini-lab paper - Fuji Crystal Archive isn't.<P>Kodak papers (and films) - all of them - will block high density colors before Fuji papers will because of differences in emulsion technology. Same applies to film. <P>Also note that nobody is using Endura Ultra in their LightJet printers because the paper doesn't magically have more color saturation than normal Endura. Just a lot more contrast to fake Kodak die hards using optical printers into thinking it does. <P> You guys complaining about Endura notice how reds and magenta's lack sparkle and look muddy compared to Crystal Archive? Yup - that's Endura and Kodak's stable dye technology. You can fix some of this with a custom (read fudged) paper profile, but you still won't match the gamut of Crystal Archive.<P><I>Does Endura tend to give dull results or is it the way this lab is using it? </i><P>It's a wedding / prom / little league team pic paper that Kodak hypes because they finally caught up to where Fuji was 10 years ago in terms of dye technology, and they can sell it cheaper than Crystal Archive. The paper is fine for portraits and other subjects that don't require much gamut range, but when a few of my local labs tried to slip it in their Frontiers and LightJets we screamed bloody murder because it simply looks *FLAT*. About the only advantage Endura has is better density range, which makes it nicer for sepia or digital B&W prints. Crystal Archive doesn't have a really strong black unlike the Kodak materials. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott_eaton Posted September 19, 2006 Share Posted September 19, 2006 <I>I personally think Fuji's Crystal Archive is too heavy on the blues and greens.</i><P>Considering neither dye exists in color paper, how can this be? Kodak now claiming they are formulating additive dyes in color paper? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now