frank_a._bridges Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 The Kiev 4 came from Alex today. I have never used anything like it. Is it a copy of the Contax II (circa 1936) ? If not , which model contax is it modeled after? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mskovacs Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Its mostly Contax III (meter) with some IIIA cosmetics added. The meter/rewind side is a IIIA imitation, the latches for the removable back are different, the meter housing looks different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerkko_kehravuo Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Indeed, it is not a copy. (If I did understand your case right.) Russians did steal the whole Contax factory. Not only designs, machines and rawmaterials but workers too. The whole factory. Such is life sometimes with a superpower state. Kerkko K. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_shriver Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 They also appropriated the tooling and training. But the training wore off, over time. Lost in a haze of Vodka. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roman_sonnleitner1 Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Kerkko, the Russians did not exactly 'steal' the factory - the factory wa part of the reparations after WWII, the Russians had more than every right of taking pretty much anything from Germany they wanted... Roman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank_a._bridges Posted April 9, 2005 Author Share Posted April 9, 2005 I love this forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicolas_douez Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Frank, read what Peter Hennig tells about the Kiev RF cameras : http://www.cameraquest.com/zconrfKiev.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gene m Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 <a href="http://westfordcomp.com/classics/kiev41960/"> Some Kiev 4 shots</a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mskovacs Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Mine's a '60 too Gene. Good year for Kiev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
connealy Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Gene, you always get such great results from that Kodak Gold 200. With your example in mind, I recently picked up a roll of it. Haven't been able to bring myself to shoot anything with it yet, though, because I know the local labs will punish it severely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gene m Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Genius prevails...genius prevails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
summitar Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 I just received my Kiev 4A yesterday for about the same price. Has Jupiter 8 f2.0 50 mm lens. YOu can find a lot of info including manual at this great site: http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/index-frameset.html?Kiev4a.html~mainFrame Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
varjag Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 <i>Russians did steal the whole Contax factory. Not only designs, machines and rawmaterials but workers too. The whole factory.</i> <p>As it was mentioned, they: <p>1) Didn't steal it, but recieved as a part of war reparations, per agreement between Britain, Russia and the USA at the Yalta conference. Other allies had their share of trophy as well from their respective occupation sectors; <p>2) Not the "whole" factory, but only what has remained after the allied carpet-bombing of Dresden. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_mcbride Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 The Russians DID steal the Contax tooling AFAIC because the Germans were not party to the agreement through which the Russians acquired the tooling. At least the Americans gave back what they took via the Marshall Plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard_p Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 Russian did not steal anything from Germany. The contax was part of war reparation. Of course, Germany was no part of the deal because it's defeated. The old contax product line was bombed into ash. Even the blueprint in the safe stored underground could not survived the bombing. After the war, Carl Zeiss built three new production lines that were eventually moved to Russian. The U.S. took away a lot of intellectual properties (you may call it a steal). In this regard, German people hate the U.S. more than Russian. I believe all the Zeiss prototype lenses/equipment are still lost in the U.S. Richard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicolas_douez Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 Is the Cold War back onto this forum ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pensacolaphoto Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 Jim: I heard from Germans that many important [money making] patents were not returned to Germany. "At least the Americans gave back what they took via the Marshall Plan." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mskovacs Posted April 12, 2005 Share Posted April 12, 2005 No judgements here as Germany was a defeated war enemy: 1500 tons of patents were liberated from Germany by the USA. This is unprecedented even today where an entire nation's intellectual property was emptied out. A good number of their brightest scientists and engineers followed. Of course, the most poignant example would be von Braun's rocketry and most of his team, without which, I doubt America would have made it to the moon. To play the opposite side of the argument, he probably would have never made it to the moon without the USA. Did anyone catch last month the release of a new book that suggests that the Germans may have carried out two small scale nuclear weapons tests before the USA? I believe there are groups now looking for evidence of such tests. If true, its remarkable what can be covered-up in the recording of history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
varjag Posted April 13, 2005 Share Posted April 13, 2005 Sorry Jim, but the Yalta agreements are pretty much a part of the international law, recognized by the United Nations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_mcbride Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 The Yalta agreements were (are) a great disgrace and only sanctioned reality. As far as the U.N. is concerned, that is the same organization which supervised Iraq's so-called "Oil for Food" program. We've all seen what a sham that has been. The bahavior of the Allies after World War II is nothing to be proud of for any of the participants, but Russia was the worst of the bunch. It's too bad that history is written by the victors because truth is often the greatest victim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
varjag Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 Sorry again Jim, it wasn't Russia who carpet-bombed Dresden or nuked the Japanese citites. It wasn't lining the Germans along the walls after the victory either. Pardon me as I dismiss your opinion as unsubstantiated and bogus attempt at revisionism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eugene_scherba Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 <p><i>The bahavior of the Allies after World War II is nothing to be proud of for any of the participants</i></p> <p>Jim, your spelin and your ignoranse is nothin to be proud of aither.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_mcbride Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 Alas, I don't do badly for someone who flunked out of the second grade. OK, Amerika is the great Satan who forced Germany into World War II and then stripped away all German assets after defeating the Vaterland (actually it was Russia that did all the fighting). Russia never committed any atrocities; all the bad things were done by the Amerikans. When Adam and Eve committed Original Sin and were ejected from Paradise, it was actually Moscow they were thrown out of. It was only an inadvertent omission that Pope John Paul II failed to canonize Josef Stalin. <snark OFF> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eugene_scherba Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 <p>Jim, you can say whatever you want.</p> <p>Both of my parents were born in concentration camps in Siberia, so I know what I speak of. And you better finish your school... They teach things there, ya know...</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maria_s. Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 Dingo ate your baby? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now