vuk_vuksanovic Posted May 3, 2005 Author Share Posted May 3, 2005 rene. do you find those to be better than my first choices? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brambor Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 It's hard to say. It depends on the application. I think she might like herself better in 3 and 9 but that doesn't mean that some other shots aren't better for commercial or artistic purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vuk_vuksanovic Posted May 3, 2005 Author Share Posted May 3, 2005 rene. these were done for artistic purposes. did you imagine i was running a portrait studio or something? ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vuk_vuksanovic Posted May 3, 2005 Author Share Posted May 3, 2005 just a sample of the sharpness the agfa film gave me:<br><br> <a href="http://www3.sympatico.ca/qstatistic/maya06/mayaSharp.htm">http://www3.sympatico.ca/qstatistic/maya06/mayaSharp.htm</a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
subpopstar Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 Vuk - From the reject pile I really like 2 and 3. I'm having trouble deciding between the two, but I think 2 may have it. There's just something about her expression and raised shoulder I find very intriguing. Nice! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank granovski Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 The reason why I started shooting at 800asa with the Delta 3200 years ago was because my long lost Voigtlander Vitomatic 11 didn't have the the higher film speed settings; and I found the results good. In sunny days I too prefer the Delta 100. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_mcbride Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 Vuk: your pictures are good. For those of you with computers that wouldn't let you see the pictures, a modest proposal: ditch your Wintel computers and buy Macintosh computers which run OS X. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vuk_vuksanovic Posted May 3, 2005 Author Share Posted May 3, 2005 hey jim. to be fair, it is not the end users who had trouble--the server hosting the first batch of pictures was being flakey earlier today (and last week at one point). i doubt even my russian computer/OS would have managed to hook up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al_kaplan1 Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 Vuk, I just returned to check this thread and discovered that you did the hair styling! You did a fantastic job! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brambor Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 LOL. Sorry Vuk. Well for artistic purposes I'm with you in the original batch of keepers with number 4 in the first and number 1 in the second. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
christian hilmersen www. Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 I am looking forward to develop my APX100 - looks like a very good film.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert goldstein Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 The Agfa's tonality is buttery smooth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donald_brewster Posted May 6, 2005 Share Posted May 6, 2005 Good photos, attractive model. I could live with either film. At least online, don't see much difference (unlike part 1), and both films appear to have served their purpose well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now