alfred_alfred Posted November 1, 2004 Share Posted November 1, 2004 Different Ilford film with the same iso rating. Which is suitable for what events? Anu particular caharacteristic for them which directs us to use them for a particular subject or events?I usually use Delta 400 rated at 320. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_waller Posted November 1, 2004 Share Posted November 1, 2004 Ilford HP5 and Delta 400 have a nominal ASA of 400, FP4 has a nominal ASA of 125. Delta 400 is finer grained than HP5 and its tonality is different, Delta 400 being a 'new technology' film (i.e. delta-grain). HP5 has always been known as a 'photojournalists' film while Delta 400 is intended more for 'fine art' photographers, but it's not as cut and dried as that in reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_stockdale2 Posted November 1, 2004 Share Posted November 1, 2004 HP4 was maybe 25 years ago. HP5, then HP5+ were/are the next incarnations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimvanson Posted November 1, 2004 Share Posted November 1, 2004 As always, recommended film speeds are just a starting point -- the way you meter and the developer/dilution you use are what really decides if your HP5+ is 160 as in Rodinal at 1+100, 200 as in PMK 1+2+100, or 400+ in 1+3 Xtol.<P>So you really should match what you have available to your requirements.<P>And if you don't soup your own films? I'd use XP2 Super or Kodak's chromogenic and let the one hour photo place do your negs in their machine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russ_butner___portland__or Posted November 1, 2004 Share Posted November 1, 2004 I really like the Delta 400. But since I discovered the Fuji Neopan 400, I rarley shoot the Delta. The Neopan 400 has very nice & tight grain. Much nicer than Tri-X or HP_5. However, it is an "old" style film. Not one of the "Tabular" or Delta grain films. I shoot it @ 320 too. Fantastic film, try it. Russ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jose_francisco Posted November 2, 2004 Share Posted November 2, 2004 Russ, which developer do you use on Fuji? And what time/ytemperature combo? Dou you use conderser enlarger? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russ_butner___portland__or Posted November 5, 2004 Share Posted November 5, 2004 J.F. Negrete , nov 02, 2004; 01:28 a.m. Russ, which developer do you use on Fuji? And what time/ytemperature combo? Dou you use conderser enlarger? Thanks. J.F. I have a pro lab, soup my B/W films now. I do know that they use X-Tol. If you want more information, I'll gladly ask them for you. Would you like me to? Have you tried the Neopan 400? It's phenomenal film. Ever since discovering it, I have totally abandoned Tri-X and HP-5. I burn it @ 320. Russ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larry_kalajainen2 Posted November 19, 2004 Share Posted November 19, 2004 I've gotten great negs from Neopan 400, rated at 125 (I use a yellow filter over the lens) and developed in my Phenidone/Vitamin C homebrew for 7'15" at 70F. The homebrew is 1 tsp. Kodalk (metaborate), 1/2 tsp. Vit. C powder, and 4 ml 1%Phenidone per liter of water. Agitation 2 inversions every 30 sec. Same developer works great with Delta 400 (rated at 200) and developed for 6' at 70F. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now