mtwhite Posted October 3, 2004 Share Posted October 3, 2004 <p><a href="http://www.rochesterdandc.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041002/BUSINESS/410020333&SearchID=73185676035359">Link here.</a> <p>The news article itself is about software patents, and not photography, but if Kodak can collect the damages it could give them a nice warchest to play with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_menegatos Posted October 3, 2004 Share Posted October 3, 2004 Hard to believe they even won considering the patent might be invalid due to prior art based on what little I know about the patent. If the patent preceds shared libraries and COM they might have a chance. Even if the patent doesn't get invalidated, no way are they going to get anywhere near $1b. That's half the operating profit of the sales of their servers for the time in which the patent was in effect. Kodak's patent probably only covers a portion of what java is to begin with. They may get a couple of hundred million at most, if anything, in my opinion. Also, buying a company and using it's patents to sue technology that's been around for almost a decade doesn't win you many friends in the software world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grizzlymarmot Posted October 3, 2004 Share Posted October 3, 2004 "It's finally nice to see the ball rolling after everyone went through a sea of negatives," Hayes said. Aren't "negatives" a good thing for Kodak? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_shop Posted October 3, 2004 Share Posted October 3, 2004 They can use the money to change the name of their remaining films every couple of months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_menegatos Posted October 3, 2004 Share Posted October 3, 2004 My favorite was this in a pre trial article "A verdict in Kodak's favor has the potential to be enormous. The company is asking for more than $1 billion in back royalties and other damages ? the equivalent of selling 400 million rolls of film at $2.50 apiece." <p> 400 million rolls, isn't that the amount of film sales being lost to fuji and digital every year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
__stu_evans Posted October 3, 2004 Share Posted October 3, 2004 Maybe they could halt the shortfall by inventing an instant film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markci Posted October 3, 2004 Share Posted October 3, 2004 Heh -- that's funny. If they get the whole billion it'll be roughly the amount they lost to Polaroid ($873 million) 18 years ago. Without interest, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill_tuthill Posted October 8, 2004 Share Posted October 8, 2004 Yesterday Kodak and SunW settled out of court for an undisclosed sum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madwand Posted October 10, 2004 Share Posted October 10, 2004 From The Register:<p> <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/10/07/kodak_sun_settle/">Sun settles Java spat with Kodak for $92m</a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now